About Dismissed With Prejudice

[Fredric]

plaintiff (A lender /A charge card) didn't appear to the Test designated ULTIMATE, and had a brief history of seeking programs preceding, leading to this frivolous case be adjourned for a long time. Anyhow, today, finally it is over. I believe?my problem will there be in whatever way at-all they are able to lure an incident, or restart a brand new one for your same curiosity, that's dismissed with prejudice from the judge?

[Birdhil]

Provided the string of activities (debt not mine, plaintiff offered fake affidavits, needs to disclose recognized, basic "fake" admissions to the case, handed the case to another selection company without informing me of substitution, AND not determining that before worker recognized the brand new lawyer being an attempted hidden substitution, etc) - this all amounts to gross abuse of process, so when they do, that could be only one more section with their tale of constant abuse of process/the courtroom...thx for your responses guys. at minimum the 'prejudice' is there on report

[gerard]

Google:New York abuse of processThere's a lot of information and references.See if you can find anything helpful.

[Anselm]

The nasty information may exist on your credit reports for a very long time--and its difficult to make paper trails go away.If in fact there is a written dismissal with prejudice order entered I'd suggest you get several certified copies of same--you may need then down the road to help convince others thats its stone cold issue.I might wait out the appeal period to get same.

[Kylen]

No one wants to say "Never say never".Firstly, the plaintiff may indeed have a short period of time in which to appeal the judge's order.
If this just happened two days ago, I would not think that the time is up quite yet.
But the period of time in which to appeal is probably fairly short, perhaps as short as 15 days but 45 to 60 days would be more typical.
You will have to look up state specific info here.Assuming that initial time period for an appeal expires without an appeal being filed, I would agree that it would be very difficult for the plaintiff to bring the case again.
Perhaps. not impossible.
But EXTREMELY difficult.

[Rossiter]

A termination with prejudice does not really avoid the plaintiff from suing again.He can easily visit the courtroom weeks later, complete the documents, spend the charge, obtain a fresh situation quantity, and also have you served.You might, obviously, have the ability to get this 1 ignored, too.If the plaintiff irritated the judge frequently enough the plaintiff may find herself having a little bit of trouble.