Cvc 22349(a) Rushing And No Present Evidence Of Insurance

[Ephraim]

My issue entails a speeding citation in the State-Of: California<br />
I was recently reported for speeding heading southbound to the i5 before Six Flags Magic Mountain. He stated I was performing 79 in a 65 (P.F) though used to do not ask how he decided my pace. <br />
It was an earlier Tuesday morning with extremely light-traffic with clear and dry climate. I had been pursuing 2 vehicles in front of me going comparable pace in number 1 street. I assumed because Iam in an organization I'd be okay...evidently not. Both vehicles ahead extended on ignorant as to the simply happened.<br />
He asked me easily understood why he pulled me around for and I stated "No". He replied that I was heading a little quick back therein which I stated that was simply following using the circulation of vehicles in front of me. Obviously he currently composed his head to provide me a solution as soon as he arrived after me.<br />
Therefore used to do just a little study with this and it appears like I've just 2 defenses. 1) Decide if this can be a speed trap. 2) Question the reliability of the unit utilized to find out my pace (calibration day...ect). CVC 22349(a) is fairly clear-cut on rushing unlike 22350 which is really a a bit more calm. Therefore Iam assuming these would be the greatest defenses that I've?<br />
I am thinking about contesting this quotation via a TBD. Before I sumit that Iam assuming I'll want to get a traffic study to ascertain if this can be a speed trap and a breakthrough to discover how he got my speed and every other specifics he created have mentioned as proof. Thus my concerns are, how precisely do I get yourself a copy of the traffic study? Next I am also likely to obtain a breakthrough and have discovered 2-letter layouts for the request. Issue is, each theme is for another objective; Ex A - speeding involving radar/laser and PF velocity restriction, Ex W - speeding involving pacing. Because I do not know if he employed radar or spaced me which theme do I opt for?<br />
When it comes to number evidence of insurance, I used to be presently covered but simply forgot to possess my good insurance card with me. I believe I could possibly get this fixed to get a $10 charge in the court.

[Bemelle]

Dude...
you gotta trust me....









22349.
(a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person may drive

a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than 65 miles per hour.

[Kajetan]

But on the ticket he checked off P.F. instead of Max. Speed. Also isn't a Maximum speed limit shown on the actual speed sign as well? Checking on Google maps on street view shows the sign saying "Speed Limit 65" and not Maximum Speed 65.

[Odale]

65 mph isn't a prima-facie speed control... It's a legal maximum restriction. A rate study isn't essential to warrant that restriction, therefore it is going to do you-no good. Do the breakthrough as though radar or lidar was applied. Request both. They merely will not have the ability to supply what was not used.

[jabarl]

Were you ticketed by CHiP, I'm not familiar but they used to only clock, and if that's the case speed trap would not be an issue, very hard to fight those tickets. I believe traffic flow would be a defense.