Information is going around the internet that Obama has given away the Delong Island and Copper Island which are reportedly rich in oil to Putin. Could this be true? The islands appear to be well within Russia's meritime boundry.The articles I have read allege the islands belong to Alaska.
ANSWER: Geminga,
It is true that President Obama has to deal with this issue. The truth is that Obama is choosing not to reclaim the islands instead of merely "giving them to Russia." The origin of this issue actually began much earlier. The USSR, now Russia has laid claim to islands in the Arctic Ocean and the Bearing Sea for decades. In order to appease the USSR a maritime agreement was signed between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on June 1, 1990(see agreement below). Both of the islands you mention fall within the USSR side of the maritime boundary. The reason why the agreement is not yet ratified is that the USSR collapsed one year after the agreement was signed and the new Russian Federation has yet to do so. Therefore as the Russians have not recognized the agreement it is not yet ratified. To add further confusion to the issue is that our own State Department has declared that the U.S. does not have a legal claim to the islands. As such the islands are in "limbo."
Here is probably one of the most objective articles on the issue written in February of this year:
******************************************************
Joe Miller reports for WorldNetDaily that Obama’s war against U.S. energy independence continues unabated this month with a foreign-aid program that directly threatens Alaska’s sovereign territory. The Obama administration is giving away seven strategic, resource-laden Alaskan islands to the Russians.
Miller should know because he is an Alaskan. More than that, this is the same Joe Miller who was the 2010 Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate from Alaska. A West Point graduate, decorated combat veteran from the first Gulf War, and former judge, Miller holds a law degree from Yale and an advanced economics degree from the University of Alaska.
Miller continues:
“The seven endangered islands in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea include one the size of Rhode Island and Delaware combined. The Russians are also to get the tens of thousands of square miles of oil-rich seabeds surrounding the islands. The Department of Interior estimates billions of barrels of oil are at stake.
The State Department has undertaken the giveaway in the guise of a maritime boundary agreement between Alaska and Siberia. Astoundingly, our federal government itself drew the line to put these seven Alaskan islands on the Russian side. But as an executive agreement, it could be reversed with the stroke of a pen by President Obama or Secretary Clinton.
The agreement was negotiated in total secrecy. The state of Alaska was not allowed to participate in the negotiations, nor was the public given any opportunity for comment. This is despite the fact the Alaska Legislature has passed resolutions of opposition – but the State Department doesn’t seem to care.
The imperiled Arctic Ocean islands include Wrangell, Bennett, Jeannette and Henrietta. Wrangell became American in 1881 with the landing of the U.S. Revenue Marine ship Thomas Corwin. The landing party included the famed naturalist John Muir. It is 3,000 square miles in size.
Northwest of Wrangell are the DeLong Islands, named for George Washington DeLong, the captain of USS Jeannette. Also in 1881, he discovered and claimed these three islands for the United States. He named them for the voyage co-sponsor, New York City newspaper publisher James Gordon Bennett. The ship’s crew received a hero’s welcome back in Washington, and Congress awarded them gold medals.
In the Bering Sea at the far west end of the Aleutian chain are Copper Island, Sea Lion Rock and Sea Otter Rock. They were ceded to the U.S. in Seward’s 1867 treaty with Russia.
Now is the time for the Obama administration to stand up for U.S. and Alaskan rights and invaluable resources. The State Department’s maritime agreement is a loser – it gives us nothing in return for giving up Alaska’s sovereign territory and invaluable resources. We won the Cold War and should start acting like it.
The Obama administration must stop the giveaway immediately.
[...] This is not a new issue. In fact the Bush and Clinton administrations are directly at fault for the same inaction. A maritime agreement negotiated by the U.S. State Department set the Russian boundary on the other side of the disputed islands, but no treaty has ratified this action. Consequently, it is within the president’s power to stop this giveaway. The Alaska delegation’s failure to put pressure on the administration is inexplicable. State Department Watch, an organization that assisted with this article, has confronted each administration and is currently confronting the Obama administration — and has been met by silence. I’m hoping this piece will help reinvigorate efforts to stop this handover.”
Here’s an addendum to Miller’s op-ed [Source]:
1. This giveaway of the 8 Alaskan islands via an agreement on maritime boundary between Alaska and Russia began in the Ford administration, spearheaded by Henry Kissinger.
2. Negotiations continued through the Carter, Reagan, and Bush Administrations with no public, Congressional, or State of Alaska’s input sought by the State Department.
3. An agreement was reached under George Bush the Elder’s administration in 1990, but it was an executive agreement, not a treaty(requiring the Senate’s approval) as it should be. Colin Powell was secretary of state.
4. In 1997, the Russian parliament(Duma) voted to void the agreement because they want even more concessions from the U.S. The Russian President hasn’t voided it, yet, and so secret negotiations between Russia and our State Department continue to this day.
******************************************************
DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS
Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics on the maritime boundary,
1 June 1990
The United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics(hereinafter "the Parties"),
Recalling the United States-Russia Convention of March 18/30, 1867(hereinafter "the 1867 Convention"),
Desiring to resolve issues concerning the maritime boundary between the United States and the Soviet Union,
Desiring to ensure that coastal State jurisdiction is exercised in all maritime areas in which such jurisdiction could be
exercised for any purpose by either of the Parties, in accordance with international law, in the absence of a maritime boundary,
Have agreed as follows:
Article 1
1. The Parties agree that the line described as the "western limit" in article 1 of the 1867 Convention, as defined in article
2 of this Agreement, is the maritime boundary between the United States and the Soviet Union.
2. Each Party shall respect the maritime boundary as limiting the extent of its coastal State jurisdiction otherwise
permitted by international law for any purpose.
Article 2
1. From the initial point, 65° 30' N., 168° 58' 37" W., the maritime boundary extends north along the 168° 58' 37" W.
meridian through the Bering Strait and Chukchi Sea into the Arctic Ocean as far as permitted under international law.
2. From the same initial point, the maritime boundary extends southwestward and is defined by lines connecting the
geographic positions set forth in the Annex, which is an integral part of this Agreement.
3. All geographic positions are defined in the World Geodetic System 1984("WGS 84") and, except where noted, are
connected by geodetic lines.
Article 3
1. In any area east of the maritime boundary that lies within 200 nautical miles of the baselines from which the breadth of
the territorial sea of the Soviet Union is measured but beyond 200 nautical miles of the baselines from which the breadth of the
territorial sea of the United States is measured("eastern special area"), the Soviet Union agrees that henceforth the United States
may exercise the sovereign rights and jurisdiction derived from exclusive economic zone jurisdiction that the Soviet Union would
otherwise be entitled to exercise under international law in the absence of the agreement of the Parties on the maritime boundary.
2. In any area west of the maritime boundary that lies within 200 nautical miles of the baselines from which the breadth of
the territorial sea of the United States is measured but beyond 200 nautical miles of the baselines from which the breadth of the
territorial sea of the Soviet Union is measured("western special area"), the United States agrees that henceforth the Soviet Union
may exercise the sovereign rights and jurisdiction derived from exclusive economic zone jurisdiction that the United States
would otherwise be entitled to exercise under international law in the absence of the agreement of the Parties on the maritime
boundary.
3. To the extent that either Party exercises the sovereign rights or jurisdiction in the special area or areas on its side of the
maritime boundary as provided for in this article, such exercise of sovereign rights or jurisdiction derives from the agreement of
the Parties and does not constitute an extension of its exclusive economic zone. To this end, each Party shall take the necessary
steps to ensure that any exercise on its part of such rights or jurisdiction in the special area or areas on its side of the maritime
boundary shall be so characterized in its relevant laws, regulations, and charts.
page 2| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on 18/03/2002
DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS
Article 4
The maritime boundary as defined in this Agreement shall not affect or prejudice in any manner either Party's position
with respect to the rules of international law relating to the law of the sea, including those concerned with the exercise of
sovereignty, sovereign rights or jurisdiction with respect to the waters or seabed and subsoil.
Article 5
For the purposes of this Agreement, "coastal State jurisdiction" refers to the sovereignty, sovereign rights, or any other
form of jurisdiction with respect to the waters or seabed and subsoil that may be exercised by a coastal State in accordance with
the international law of the sea.
Article 6
Any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall be resolved by negotiation or other
peaceful means agreed by the Parties.
This Agreement shall be subject to ratification and shall enter into force on the date of exchange of instruments of
ratification.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the duly authorized representatives of the Parties have signed the present Agreement.
DONE at Washington, this first day of June, 1990, in duplicate, in the English and Russian languages, each text being
equally authentic.
ANNEX
The geographic positions set forth in this Annex are on the World Geodetic System 1984("WGS 84") and, except where
noted, are connected by geodetic lines. One nautical mile equals 1,852 meters.
The maritime boundary is defined as follows:
From the initial point, 65° 30' N., 168° 58' 37" W., the maritime boundary extends north along the 168° 58' 37" W.
meridian through the Bering Strait and Chukchi Sea into the Arctic Ocean as far as permitted under international law.
From the same initial point, the maritime boundary extends southwestward connecting the following geographic
positions:
2. 65° 19' 58" N., 169° 21' 38" W.
3. 65° 09' 51" N., 169° 44' 34" W.
4. 64° 59' 41" N., 170° 07' 23" W.
5. 64° 49' 26" N., 170° 30' 06" W.
6. 64° 39' 08" N., 170° 52' 43" W.
7. 64° 28' 46" N., 171° 15' 14" W.
8. 64° 18' 20" N., 171° 37' 40" W.
9. 64° 07' 50" N., 172° 00' 00" W.
10. 63° 59' 27" N., 172° 18' 39" W.
11. 63° 51' 01" N., 172° 37' 13" W.
12. 63° 42' 33" N., 172° 55' 42" W.
13. 63° 34' 01" N., 173° 14' 07" W.
14. 63° 25' 27" N., 173° 32' 27" W.
15. 63° 16' 50" N., 173° 50' 42" W.
16. 63° 08' 11" N., 174° 08' 52" W.
page 3| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on 18/03/2002
DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS
17. 62° 59' 29" N., 174° 26' 58" W.
18. 62° 50' 44" N., 174° 44' 59" W.
19. 62° 41' 56" N., 175° 02' 56" W.
20. 62° 33' 06" N., 175° 20' 48" W.
21. 62° 24' 13" N., 175° 38' 36" W.
22. 62° 15' 17" N., 175° 56' 19" W.
23. 62° 06' 19" N., 176° 13' 59" W.
24. 61° 57' 18" N., 176° 31' 34" W.
25. 61° 48' 14" N., 176° 49' 04" W.
26. 61° 39' 08" N., 177° 06' 31" W.
27. 61° 29' 59" N., 177° 23' 53" W.
28. 61° 20' 47" N., 177° 41' 11" W.
29. 61° 11' 33" N., 177° 58' 26" W.
30. 61° 02' 17" N., 178° 15' 36" W.
31. 60° 52' 57" N., 178° 32' 42" W.
32. 60° 43' 35" N., 178° 49' 45" W.
33. 60° 34' 11" N., 179° 06' 44" W.
34. 60° 24' 44" N., 179° 23' 38" W.
35. 60° 15' 14" N., 179° 40' 30" W.
36. 60° 11' 39" N., 179° 46' 49" W.;
thence, it extends along an arc with a radius of 200 nautical miles and a center at 60° 38' 23" N.,
173° 06' 54" W. to
37. 59° 58' 22" N., 179° 40' 55" W.;
thence, it extends southwestward along the rhumb line, defined by the following points: 64° 05'
08" N., 172° 00' 00" W., 53° 43' 42" N., 170° 18' 31" E. to
38. 58° 57' 18" N., 178° 33' 59" E.;
thence, it extends along an arc with a radius of 200 nautical miles and a center at 62° 16' 09" N.,
179° 05' 34" E. to
39. 58° 58' 14" N., 178° 15' 05" E.
40. 58° 57' 58" N., 178° 14' 37" E.
41. 58° 48' 06" N., 177° 58' 14" E.
42. 58° 38' 12" N., 177° 41' 53" E.
43. 58° 28' 16" N., 177° 25' 34" E.
44. 58° 18' 17" N., 177° 09' 18" E.
45. 58° 08' 15" N., 176° 53' 04" E.
46. 57° 58' 11" N., 176° 36' 52" E.
47. 57° 48' 04" N., 176° 20' 43" E.
48. 57° 37' 54" N., 176° 04' 35" E.
49. 57° 27' 42" N., 175° 48' 31" E.
50. 57° 17' 28" N., 175° 32' 28" E.
51. 57° 07' 11" N., 175° 16' 27" E.
52. 56° 56' 51" N., 175° 00' 29" E.
53. 56° 46' 29" N., 174° 44' 32" E.
54. 56° 36' 04" N., 174° 28' 38" E.
55. 56° 25' 37" N., 174° 12' 46" E.
56. 56° 15' 07" N., 173° 56' 56" E.
page 4| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on 18/03/2002
DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS
57. 56° 04' 34" N., 173° 41' 08" E.
58. 55° 53' 59" N., 173° 25' 22" E.
59. 55° 43' 22" N., 173° 09' 37" E.
60. 55° 32' 42" N., 172° 53' 55" E.
61. 55° 21' 59" N., 172° 38' 14" E.
62. 55° 11' 14" N., 172° 22' 36" E.
63. 55° 00' 26" N., 172° 06' 59" E.
64. 54° 49' 36" N., 171° 51' 24" E.
65. 54° 38' 43" N., 171° 35' 51" E.
66. 54° 27' 48" N., 171° 20' 20" E.
67. 54° 16' 50" N., 171° 04' 50" E.
68. 54° 05' 50" N., 170° 49' 22" E.
69. 53° 54' 47" N., 170° 33' 56" E.
70. 53° 43' 42" N., 170° 18' 31" E.
71. 53° 32' 46" N., 170° 05' 29" E.
72. 53° 21' 48" N., 169° 52' 32" E.
73. 53° 10' 49" N., 169° 39' 40" E.
74. 52° 59' 48" N., 169° 26' 53" E.
75. 52° 48' 46" N., 169° 14' 12" E.
76. 52° 37' 43" N., 169° 01' 36" E.
77. 52° 26' 38" N., 168° 49' 05" E.
78. 52° 15' 31" N., 168° 36' 39" E.
79. 52° 04' 23" N., 168° 24' 17" E.
80. 51° 53' 14" N., 168° 12' 01" E.
81. 51° 42' 03" N., 167° 59' 49" E.
82. 51° 30' 51" N., 167° 47' 42" E.
83. 51° 19' 37" N., 167° 35' 40" E.
84. 51° 11' 22" N., 167° 26' 52" E.
thence, it extends along an arc with a radius of 200 nautical miles and a center at 54°29'42" N, 168°05'25" E to
85. 51° 12' 17" N., 167° 15' 35" E.
86. 51° 09' 09" N., 167° 12' 00" E.
87. 50° 58' 39" N., 167° 00' 00" E.
1 June 1990
Excellency:
I have the honor to refer to the Agreement between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics on the Maritime Boundary, which has been signed by representatives of our two Governments today. I have the
further honor to propose that, pending the entry into force of that Agreement, the two Governments agree to abide by the terms of
that Agreement as of 15 June 1990.
On the basis of the foregoing, I have the honor to propose to Your Excellency that if the terms stipulated herein are
acceptable to the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, this note and Your Excellency's reply shall constitute
an agreement between the two Governments, which shall enter into force on the day of your reply.
I avail myself of this opportunity to renew to Your Excellency the assurances of my highest consideration.
page 5| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on 18/03/2002
DOALOS/OLA - UNITED NATIONS
James Baker III
His Excellency
Eduard A. Shevardnadze
Minister of Foreign Affairs of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
This is great information...I am not a big fan of WND as it is so partisan but I was hoping that there would be some discussion of the 1994 court case where Alaska had no jurisdiction to register the property for an American seeking to lay claim. Denardo vs State of Alaska S-5850
Superior Ct 90-6387 Civil. Unless I am wrong this pretty much takes the argument out of Alaska's hands into the State Dept although I don't really know. Am I wrong to assume that kicking this can down the road may be a function of not irritating or creating yet another problem with Russia. The geography is compelling for Russia . Is there no functioning meritime boundary between Russia and Alaska now existing? This is hardly a simple issue. It has many facets. Thank you for sharing your time and knowledge. I look forward to your input.

