by tahmelapachme33 » Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:44 am
sigh... sure... declare yourself the winner, go to your bible-study-class and pound your chest and declare how you won a stunning victory over evil by your infallible logic and now you can go off to that mission in the Congo and show the natives how they know nothing about how to live in their country and you will edu-ma-cate them so they can be like good Americans.
Or.
Or you can try actually studying what science and *actual* theories state - - not just what you have made up for yourself, or what some other poorly-educated bible-thumper has told you they say.
(1) If you were to study quantum mechanics (its a very difficult study, quite honestly, so I would not demand this of you - but I *have* studied it at the basic levels as a Mechanical engineer - studying nuclear physics/ nuclear engineering... so I know some of the basics) you would discover that things really *can* pop up out of ''nothing''. Whole universes? well... it doesn't happen ''often'' but time is a meaningless concept when the universe *isn't* in existance. This sounds very obscure and almost as if ''magic'' is being invoked, but the math *does* point to this. Unfortunately it is math that requires a bit more than high-school algebra. (Feel free to resort tothe first option)
(2) Creationists absolutely **hated** conservation laws - - because those seemed to point to a universe that *always* existed - and did not require a God to ''create'' it! Until they began grossly mis-understanding (and mis-using) energy conservation as an argument against evolution (which is usually a tremendous bugaboo for creationists...) Sadly for you, conservation laws do *not* prevent evolution (just like they don't prevent you from breeding your sheep...), but they *do* set up a situation that requires more ''exotic'' explanations if it appears the universe *did* in fact pop into existance.
(3) By studiying actual visible evidence (and having the training to understand what that evidence *is*), scientists are able to determine that there are (A) other galaxies, that (B) tremendously far away from us (so far away that millions of years are needed for light to span the distance) and (C) that these other galaxies are almost *all* moving away from us and that (D) they move *faster* away from us the further they are!! (This fits exactly with a universe that 'popped' into existance (14+Billion years ago) - and does require scientists to look at the evidence out there.)
(4) Big bang theory (Expansion theory) does NOT state *why* the universe came into existance. There is reasonably good speculation /hypotheses that it happened because of quantum fluctuation. If you feel like declaring that God created the quantum fluctuation, fine. (Go right on back to the first option) Of course, the issue of primogeniture remains. (The old ''what/who made God?'' question....''and who made *that?'' and so on. [hint- its turtles all the way down...] )
I prefer the God of St Augustine - who requires that we come to know him by studying his handiwork - by learning of the *world*, the universe, and all that is in it - - rather than blindly touting words that have been *repeated mis-used, mis-interpreted and mi-understood by peoples of every agenda.
I'd love to declare checkmate in return, but sadly, all that can be honestly declared is stalemate - because you will dance your dance of illogic and anger and intolerance to your own foregone conclusion.
So, as I noted as the start, it may be best if you just declared yourself the winner and trot off puffing out your chest at your ''accomplishement'', while we actually continue to study the world that exists - created by god, quantum fluctuation, or flying spaghetti monster.