by Emlyn » Sat Feb 08, 2014 8:45 pm
I've an ex-tenant who is suing me in small-claims court. After I purchased the system in November, I found out there clearly was a rat problem in her walls. The moment I found out, I contracted Terminex to eliminate them. I also contracted them to eliminate infection and powdered article beetles within the basement. Per month or two afterwards and the rats were still behind the walls and a poor odor from behind 2 walls. I introduced a wildlife specialist who eliminated 2 dead rats, 2 nests and covered up the walls and concreted some Openings outside. Within the next monthapproximately, the tenant still stated to listen to the subjects within the walls. The wildlife man had people inside twice per week setting barriers and hearing for rats. Never captured something and never noticed anything. Lastly my tenant informed me she can not go anymore and was shifting out. She offered me a letter declaring she was giving me 30 days notice as needed in her lease (which was using the prior operator). Her lease also says a 30 day notice is required. At the conclusion of the month, she switched in her secrets and was totally transferred out. I did not obtain it rented for about two weeks so I figured out the finish of the thirty days and got out the distinction from her security deposit and sent her the rest. She's suing me for a great deal more income than what is left of the deposit and she cashed the check I sent back once again to her. I've requested my present tenant if they've noticed something at all and have informed me they notice nothing at all. in my opinion the subjects are eliminated and she was getting weird from any sound the building created (it is an older building). Because she cashed the check, does she still have legal motion against me? Fortunately, I've all paperwork and the wildlife organization is giving anyone to state on my behalf. She's suing me for nearly 4 times over what the distinction is.