Fact Or False? The First Rolling Stone Magazine Featured The Beatles

by **cailean** » Sat Jan 04, 2014 5:34 pm

It's your call... if you think it's true..state Fact... if you think the answer is false...state it!

by **fiacre68** » Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:13 am

by **Uani** » Thu Jan 30, 2014 3:07 am

Oops I didn't read that right. They were not in the first one but in the third one.

by oz » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:59 am

I don't know if you wanted more on this or just a Fact or False. It was definitely someone else, but I can not remember who it was. I'm sure you know and I hope you will tell us after this closes. In the meantime, I'll do some research and come back and comment after it closes, of course, at least I will know who it was!! I hope that's all you wanted, cuz I will just cry if I get a 'You suck' rating !!

by **advent** » Thu Feb 06, 2014 11:00 pm

False!! I don't know if you wanted more on this or just a Fact or False. It was definitely someone else, but I can not remember who it was. I'm sure you know and I hope you will tell us after this closes. In the meantime, I'll do some research and come back and comment after it closes, of course, at least I will know who it was!! I hope that's all you wanted, cuz I will just cry if I get a 'You suck' rating !! LILYGAL's Recommendations Rolling Stone 1,000 Covers: A History of the Most Influential Magazine in Pop Culture Amazon List Price: $35.00 Used from: $11.75 Average Customer Rating: 5.0 out of 5(based on 2 reviews) Rolling Stone Magazine, 1987 September Issue #509 Used from: $8.00 Hey, maybe it's that guy, down there on the bottom. :0) LILYGAL 78 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

by **Lindell** » Fri Feb 14, 2014 11:09 pm

iamhobbit said: 1 Oops I didn't read that right. They were not in the first one but in the third one. 78 months ago

by **Earc** » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:36 pm

According to the link below they were featured in Edition #3. Also in Issue #22 they interviewed John Lennon who was on the cover buck ass naked with his wife Yoko. I just want to know why they would put two such ugly hineys on the cover?

by **Eldridge** » Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:05 pm

Follow the link. The first cover photo is of John Lennon, who was a member of The Beatles, but was not, by himself, The Beatles.

by **Lauro** » Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:55 am

False: It's just John Lennon Follow the link. The first cover photo is of John Lennon, who was a member of The Beatles, but was not, by himself, The Beatles. Sources: http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/10225276/early_years_67__69 newbie2380711 78 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links: