Is There Something In The Water In Utah? Why Not Exactly Illegal, It Is, To Me, A Sad Statement On Humans - Wdyt?

[Parke]

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/money/55650985-79/lee-utah-employees-costs.html.csp

[Dilwyn]

Firing men and women for their political views or attempting to charge them more for a service for their political views when that is the openly stated cause, opens up these businesses to reputable lawsuits for descriminatory practices.Though it doesn't appear to be protected in Utah, you can bet there are precedents for it in the legal code each in the state and federally which lawyers can and will use in the defense of their customers.This sort of considering is just a lot more of a demonstration on the component of a political branch of society that is becoming increasingly marginalized due to their bigoted views of the rest of the country(the majority). What is next, firing folks simply because they support gun handle?   NanoNano 11 months ago

[gideon]

They have been not prime performers. He had to let two men and women go because of the cost of Obamacare so he fired the employees that supported the tax improve. It is his company and his correct. His purpose for letting two low performers go is probably as very good as any other. It is, right after all, his business and not the govcernment's and he can employ and fire whoe he chooses to help his enterprise.   Directmale 11 months ago

[Ciqala]

Lee?s actions are just the most current of numerous situations in which businesses have reacted to Obamacare or to the president?s re-election by saying they may well have to trim their workforces. Darden Restaurants Inc., saw earnings decline following a customer backlash in response to its plans to cut hourly workers, which were later dropped. Coal magnate Robert Murray laid off 102 Utah miners at his West Ridge coal mine in Carbon County the day after President Obama was re-elected, citing the president?s so-known as war on coal for the layoffs.Kool-help, I would say. it is that very same tired meme that implies staffing decisions are based on tx prices, rather than on no matter whether you have sufficient staffing to meet the need to have.   TheLightWorks 11 months ago

[Lawe]

Did you read the article you cited?   Directmale 11 months ago

[MacAllen]

I feel folks would be shocked to know what percentage of the issues they buy goes into the "job creator's" pocket. nonetheless, I could be wrong. remember, these are the men and women who think sitting in a corner office is such an onerous process that no one will do it for significantly less than a million dollars a year.   TheLightWorks 11 months ago

[Rule]

*whistling jeopardy theme*   TheLightWorks 11 months ago

[Gibson]

There are uninformed people at all sites. Your article stated the fact that you seem to want to ignore. Facts are stubborn things and don't want to go away. You can wish them away but they are still there. Reality sucks for some people.   Directmale 11 months ago

[Akando]

Do I detect a thin skin? I didn't insult you at all. I also told the truth. I have owned businesses with employees for over 30 years and have hired and fired whenever I felt it was good for the business. Real world experience is different than theorizing.   Directmale 11 months ago

[Athmarr]

That is overt reaction in Utah. You are going to find there will be, and already has been, a growing amount of more hidden and disguised reaction to Obama and his 'care' as businesses find they must lay off people, outsource more, refuse to hire more, or just plain charge more to the consumer. Businesses find they just cannot follow the same rules as the federal government. Businesses actually have to pay their debts and balance their books and come out ahead to stay in business. It has nothing to do with the water; it has to do with the anger a lot of people are feeling towards this administration and its dictatorial attitude toward us.   tuppence 11 months ago