by gall » Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:32 am
Background Info:My ex-wife and I divorced in 2002 in the state of California. She wanted to move to Las Vegas, but essential my permission to move out of state. She said that if I did not give her permission, she would move to Carmel (she didn't require my permission considering that it was inside the state of California). Las Vegas was a 3 hour drive and Carmel was about 8 hours, so I gave her permission with the intent to move to Vegas in the future and share custody.I relocated to Las Vegas in December 2003. Even though she had agreed to shared custody if I moved, it took a even although for her to agree when I moved. We started 50/50 shared custody in September 2004 with my oldest daughter and December 2004 with my youngest. (She wanted to wait until my yougest was three years old.)The job business has been incredibly poor and I was laid off from my job more than a year ago. I have given that been attempting to find an added steady and promising position, but have been struggling to do so. I was not as well extended ago presented a job chance by means of a business associate, but the position is back in California.I have been performing my greatest to make the arrangement in Las Vegas operate, but it is just not functioning out financially for myself and my family members. I am seriously contemplating relocating back to California. If I do so, we (my wife, son, and daughter) will stay with her parents until we are capable to sell our residence in Las Vegas and locate one much more location. I know that this will lead to however yet another trip to court in order to choose custody of my two daughters.My query is this -Would it be better if we had been in our own location when we go to court? Will it make a distinction if we are nevertheless staying with my in-laws? Their residence is 6 bedrooms and the girls would have their own region (sharing). They share a location at their mom's house also.Thank You in Advance