When The Laws Of Physics Were To Change, Which Ones Might Change First, Because We've Only Limited Understandings Of Concepts Like Gravity And Matter? What Type Would You Change If You Can?

[matthieu2]

"Regulations" are in fact only observations. They are subject to adjust at any time. It's not not possible that even these may change.

[jerrick]

Take into account consistently the main a single that claims water flows down hill.  it'd study If that regulation have been to alter slightly: Water usually flows down hill.  That would be proof anything was wrong or issues were changing.   Which would I modify:  Seriousness.   Gravity is what typically holds us to the ground on Earth.  Naturally we would not want to alter that legislation to that indicate where it says Gravity frequently holds us to the ground on Earth.  No.  What we'd want is just a low-cost 'on power' way to access gravity and handle it's path.  In stead of pushing or pulling us to the ground--or each--we could make it push horizonally.  You could push a car down the street...no gas.  Push a spaceshuttle into space...no fluid or strong fuel.  Afix a single of these tiny products to a propeller like object On both ends of the edge, screw that right into a generator and produce truly low-cost power.   Naturally, to complete some of this, you've to tinker with that god-awful regulation of power-conservation!   BYE!

[karlitis]

I am betting: Contemplate the main one that claims water continuously flows down hill.  If that regulation were to alter slightly it'd study: Water often flows down hill.  That would be proof something was wrong or things have been altering.   Which would I modify:  Seriousness.   Gravity is what typically holds us to the ground on Earth.  Naturally we would not want to alter that legislation to that indicate where it says Gravity typically holds us to the ground on Earth.  No.  What we'd want is just a affordable 'on power' way to access gravity and deal with it's path.  In stead of pushing or pulling us to the ground--or both--we could make it push horizonally.  You could push a vehicle down the street...no gas.  Push a spaceshuttle into room...no fluid or solid fuel.  Afix 1 of these small merchandise to a propeller like object On each ends of the edge, screw that proper into a generator and produce genuinely low-cost power.   Naturally, to total some of this, you have to tinker with that god-awful regulation of power-conservation!   BYE! Resources: some expertise Oldtechnohobbiest 76 weeks previously Please register to provide a supplement. Please confirm your account to supply a supplement. Please register to deliver a note. Please confirm your account to deliver a message.

[Travis]

As a science fiction fan with a particular affinity for space operas, I would like to get rid of the law by which the velocity of matter is restricted to c, the speed of light by way of cost-free space. Of course, ditching that law would trash all of relativity theory, almost certainly to the point that the universe would promptly decompose.

[Eron]

...and the whole system comes crashing down. The basic laws of physics, the speed of light, conservation of energy, inertia and gravity, the relationship of mass and energy, etc.  The properties of physics are not isolated, each one depends on the framework entire, change one and you change them all. Change the speed of light and you change the basic physics of light, this also changes how atoms work.  A significantly different speed of light and you no longer have molecules, chemical compounds and life.  The same for gravity or any other of the basic forces.  Most of the other laws of physics are based on the fundamental properties of either light, gravity, strong or weak EM forces. A minor change may be possible, but I think you are referring to substantial changes. So start tinkering with any of the basic laws and you quickly create a universe that cannot support stars or life.  A bit like giving a three year old administrator access to your computer and showing them how the edit the registry, don?t expect it to boot up later.

[Vaddon]

Change one... ...and the whole system comes crashing down. The basic laws of physics, the speed of light, conservation of energy, inertia and gravity, the relationship of mass and energy, etc.  The properties of physics are not isolated, each one depends on the framework entire, change one and you change them all. Change the speed of light and you change the basic physics of light, this also changes how atoms work.  A significantly different speed of light and you no longer have molecules, chemical compounds and life.  The same for gravity or any other of the basic forces.  Most of the other laws of physics are based on the fundamental properties of either light, gravity, strong or weak EM forces. A minor change may be possible, but I think you are referring to substantial changes. So start tinkering with any of the basic laws and you quickly create a universe that cannot support stars or life.  A bit like giving a three year old administrator access to your computer and showing them how the edit the registry, don?t expect it to boot up later.   SiliconOwl's Recommendations The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe Amazon List Price: $25.00 Used from: $13.49 Average Customer Rating: 4.0 out of 5(based on 141 reviews) SiliconOwl 76 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

[Barre]

The universal speed limit As a science fiction fan with a special affinity for space operas, I would like to get rid of the law by which the velocity of matter is limited to c, the speed of light through free space. Of course, ditching that law would trash all of relativity theory, probably to the point that the universe would promptly decompose. euthman 76 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

[Ceolbeorht]

This one really bugs me and I'm convinced that you can know the speed and location of an electron.  I have this Atheist friend who is convinced that this principle is the cause of randomness in the universe and I can wait till we figure this out.  I mean, that stupid electron has to be somewhere...(or am I getting this confused with Schrödinger's cat?)

[aescby]

Heisenberg uncertainty principle This one really bugs me and I'm convinced that you can know the speed and location of an electron.  I have this Atheist friend who is convinced that this principle is the cause of randomness in the universe and I can wait till we figure this out.  I mean, that stupid electron has to be somewhere...(or am I getting this confused with Schrödinger's cat?) dangdatkat 76 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

[Adhamhnan]

I think that the most likely "change" would be an overcoming of mass and speed Mass and Speed as physics laws restrict a body from going very fast because the mass, if very large, would be unable to overcome inertia and the force to make it overcome such inertia would be too great. If we are to travel to other planets, that may be the first thing we have to overcome.Time would also be a useful law to overcome - if that were overcome, then the speed would not be as important. Sources: My answer awarulz 76 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.