Will State Ags Be Successful In Their Lawsuits Against The Feds?

by **Rufford** » Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:41 pm

They contend it is unconstitutional to force US citizens to acquire a solution from a private firm. Do you think that is constitutional?If they are unsuccessful do you think we will be forced to obtain other goods from private companies? If so, which ones?

by **emilek17** » Sat Jan 04, 2014 9:17 pm

TurboB said: 3 1.) no. 2.) this is not a constitutional issue 3.) > purchase other products from private companies? Such as? 45 months ago

by **Vardan** » Wed Jan 22, 2014 7:29 am

1.) no. 2.) this is not a constitutional issue 3.) > purchase other products from private companies? Such as?

by **jock** » Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:23 pm

I don't know whether they will be successful, but I certainly hope so! There is no specific place in the Constitution that allows the federal government to compel citizens to purchase anything--and the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." To me, that should be the end of the issue. Point, set, match to states' rights.

by **Ewart** » Tue Feb 04, 2014 4:18 pm

Please disregard post #1. I don't know why it is there. The original question is the correct one.

by **Kueng** » Sat Feb 08, 2014 12:23 pm

Lychnobite said: 2 i'd expect those states who defy federal law to lose much federal funding. 45 months ago

by **Ewart** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 8:51 am

i'd expect those states who defy federal law to lose much federal funding.

by **Einion** » Thu Feb 13, 2014 2:40 pm

Pam_I_Am said: 5 I don't know whether they will be successful, but I certainly hope so! There is no specific place in the Constitution that allows the federal government to compel citizens to purchase anything--and the 10th Amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." To me, that should be the end of the issue. Point, set, match to states' rights. 45 months ago

by **hew35** » Sat Feb 15, 2014 11:40 am

No, not unconstitutional. You mean "forced" like having to have auto insurance? Oh, no! the end of the Republic! MadDogDem 45 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

by **Derrell** » Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:17 am

Directmale replied to post #1: 4 Please disregard post #1. I don't know why it is there. The original question is the correct one. 45 months ago

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links: