Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Without the global security provided generously by the USA, would there be constant wars and terrorist attacks?

Discuss anything to do with property law - buying, selling property

Without the global security provided generously by the USA, would there be constant wars and terrorist attacks?

Postby seme22 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:05 am

Liberals, your rhetoric could not be confirmed
Terminating your eligible registration...
TERMINATED!

Think about this realistically based on logic and objective beliefs.

The world needs us to perpetuate individual property rights and the free market enterprise that has proven itself to be the only viable model for progress. Keynesiasm(sp?) is inefficient, leads to war, and reduces the quality of life of millions of people. Supply side is the wave of the future!

Terrorists need to be subdued by the sword and be brought democracy by the market if we are to maintain our world superpower status. They need to be reminded just who they are dealing with.

We are the voice of conservatism, the personification of strength and absolute justice.

We are the country of Reagan, the champion of the free world and liberator of the oppressed that brought down communism and the Berlin Wall; he also proved supply side economics a success.

We are the country of Palin, the new brand of intellectual that has had much success on the international scene and has re-defined what it means to be an American. 2012 might be the fist time in recent history that the current President, while eligible to re-run, will not.

We are the country of Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants that recognizes the danger of setting the precedent that the government should be in control of the private sector. The ideology his family escaped in communist cuba has killed over 160 million people and has decreased the quality of life of at least a billion others.


With the blame Free-Market America first crowd, it is always a catch 22.


Classic illustration of anti-Americanism in seven easy steps.

1. Calamitous events take place in a chaotic place (think Bosnia, think Somalia, think Iraq in 1991).
2. The U.N and the U.S intervene.
3. The civil government proves to be useless or malign, or both. The U.N isn’t up to the job. The only effective force in sight is the U.S.
4. There are only two possible outcomes.
5. The U.S takes over. If this happens, it will be accused of “creating a military occupation under the guise of humanitarian aid” and “occupying” the country outright.
6. The U.S doesn’t take over. If this happens, it will be criticised for “not doing enough” - and isolationism. And hundreds of thousands are displaced or killed.
7. So either way, the U.S loses.

"Statism needs war; a free country does not. Statism survives by looting; a free country survives by production."

"Let those who are actually concerned with peace observe that capitalism gave mankind the longest period of peace in history - a period during which there were no wars involving the entire civilized world - from the end of the Napoleonic wars in 1815 to the outbreak of World War I in 1914." -Ayn Rand, defender of the free world.


We have to fight the terrorists over there on our terms before we are forced to fight them over here on their terms in our neighborhoods and see more 9/11's happen over urban and suburban America.

We are fighting an enemy that hates freedom, hates our way of life, and they want to bring Sharia Law to the United States.

Support our troops. Support America's mission. Because it sure would not do you a lot of good to stand in front of them.

Are you with us or not? You cannot sit on the fence any longer. Whose side are you on?
seme22
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 7:17 am
Top

Without the global security provided generously by the USA, would there be constant wars and terrorist attacks?

Postby adalwine » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:17 am

I agree.

You also seem to forget that the global security that we provide is not merely charity, but a means of controlling resources to domestic businesses and advancing national interests such as providing crude resources and opening economic avenues and markets for growth and continued prosperity.

What we do is a way to propagate our superpower economic status that keeps you in computers, cheap food, and electricity.
adalwine
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:31 pm
Top

Without the global security provided generously by the USA, would there be constant wars and terrorist attacks?

Postby ned » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:25 am

Terrorist attacks originate from places that have a foreign military presence within their territories. Think about it. Then think of the simple solution.
ned
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:00 pm
Top

Without the global security provided generously by the USA, would there be constant wars and terrorist attacks?

Postby colfre » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:29 am

We have secret operations being carried out in 75 of the around 145 countries in the world killing people without due process and you think we are the ones stopping terror?
colfre
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:44 pm
Top

Without the global security provided generously by the USA, would there be constant wars and terrorist attacks?

Postby khalid » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:33 am

1. Troll
2. Too long, did not read.
3. Robot dictatorship FTW!
khalid
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:42 am
Top


Return to Property Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post