by gilbert » Sat Dec 21, 2013 1:57 pm
You have numerous prospective difficulties.1st, An soon after-the-truth agreement to pay for interest might or could not be enforceable. The arrangement will have to be supported by consideration. When the agreement to cover interest was supported by your agreement not to pursue legal action for some time frame, then I think it'd be enforceable.Second, the statute of limitations could have expired. The shoppers could have a excellent argument that CA law ought to govern (because they were living in CA at the time the loan was produced and, evidently, for at least virtually a year then). CA's statute of limitations for breach of the contract not in writing (which this evidently is because you did not indicate there clearly was any sort of written loan agreement or promissory note) is two years.Third, you may possibly not have the ability to enforce the fascination agreement. You did not say just how a lot the initial loan was for, except the total quantity of the loan was properly in excess of $10000 but $100 each month could be usurious. Again, it depends on what considerably the mortgage was for and which state's laws apply. Of course, if this is a loan nicely in excess of $10000, you might not have the capability to sue in small-claims court.All that said, your really greatest (and almost certainly only) alternative is to sue in their state where they at the moment live.