Welcome to Law-Forums.org!    Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Any Recommendations Need Help

Criminal Law Discussion Forum

Any Recommendations Need Help

Postby Greagoir » Mon Aug 18, 2014 2:27 am

Regular<br />
0<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Fake<br />
Fake<br />
Fake<br />
<br />
EN-US<br />
X-NONE<br />
X-NONE<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
MicrosoftInternetExplorer4<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Our boy is imprisoned at Support<br />
Olive Correctional Complex. He was convicted of first-degree murder, theft,<br />
and conspiracy to commit theft on August 18, 2004. He was discovered not liable<br />
of conspiracy to commit murder. He submitted a Habeascorpus request on May 30,<br />
2007 and was given a brand new test on all costs on May 20, 2010. Their state<br />
Submitted an attraction on September 20, 2010. On January 27, 2011 the Supreme Court of<br />
Appeals granted Oral Arguments. On or around May 14, 2011 he was refused bond<br />
Arising from the pro se movement he submitted on April 22, 2011. Only at that relationship reading,<br />
the prosecutor, resolved the courtroom that the fresh prosecutor must be<br />
Hired since he was the magistrate that presided in the initial<br />
Continuing, thus, a struggle arose. He, the prosecutor, approached the<br />
State Bar who claimed he'd to withdraw in the situation. The prosecutor continues to be<br />
Compared the relationship movement along with a Disciplinary Criticism continues to be submitted. A choice<br />
is pending. On May-23, 2011 the Supreme Court hired the West Virginia<br />
Attorneygeneral's Workplace to deal with the situation and given them four (4) weeks<br />
to re do the prosecutor's charm which was submitted on June 20, 2010, without<br />
doubt from defense lawyer. Once my boy discovered this on July 3, 2011, he<br />
named his lawyer and attempted to motivate him to document an opposition and his<br />
Lawyer advised him he was not processing something since he, my boy, did not operate the<br />
Display and he'd, the lawyer, submitted what he really wants to. Therefore my boy submitted the<br />
Doubt herself and delivered copies of the doubt to all of the events concerned,<br />
Simply to get a solution in the Attorney-General stating he recognizes no value within the<br />
Opposition. Each dayapproximately later, his lawyer delivered him a duplicate of the Movement To<br />
Withdraw As Lawyer. Today the Supreme Court won't take something he documents<br />
Before Lower Court makes a judgment about the Movement To Withdraw As Lawyer. No<br />
one may match him concerning the standing of the Movement to Withdraw. The<br />
Attorney General has until June 16, 2011 to possess this "new<br />
Charm" submitted. If somebody might please assist him possibly understand this<br />
straightened out, please email [email protected] Recall, his confidence<br />
Was already overturned in the Signal Degree to get a new test. His<br />
Co defendant was already released. Thanks for the time.
Greagoir
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:35 am
Top

Any Suggestions Need Help

Postby segar » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:04 am

my husbands case is very similar to your sons. hes being charged with first degree murder and conspiracy also burglary. any sugestions what to do next. jury trial starts soon.
segar
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 6:03 am
Top

Re: Any Recommendations Need Help

Postby Lawbook » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:48 am

You can also able to know about the technical terms and handle your case by yourself and in this help you the course which was very effective complete step by step procedure of court you can check from http://rulesofcourt.com
Lawbook
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:51 am
Top

Any Suggestions Need Help

Postby morcan » Wed Aug 20, 2014 6:01 pm

kath21:...and also the lawyer was right: "simply to get a solution in the Attorney-General stating he recognizes no value within the objection."<br />
Itis difficult to understand when the doubt had any value without studying it. The reaction in the AG isn't astonishing; it's the other party in the event. Simply because the other party statements there's no value does not allow it to be true.
morcan
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:16 pm
Top

Any Suggestions Need Help

Postby hraefnscaga » Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:17 am

Susan222: his attorney informed him he was not processing something since he, my boy, did not operate the display and he'd, the lawyer, submitted what he wishes to.<br />
 <br />
I truly doubt the lawyer stated precisely that; much more likely, it's boyis meaning of "no legitimate foundation to do this".  Perhaps son extended to claim and also the attorney may have been discouraged with him.<br />
...and also the lawyer was right: "simply to get a solution in the Attorney-General stating he recognizes no value within the objection."<br />
One doesn't record arguments simply because one doesn't like anything; there has to be a legitimate basis.  Obviously there is not, based on the AG.<br />
Perhaps you are ready to employ a brand new lawyer, however itis probably you might desire to be perfectly paid having a customer who believes he understands a lot more than his lawyer and moves against his advice.  Possibly should begin contacting around.<br />
 
hraefnscaga
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:10 am
Top

Any Suggestions Need Help

Postby Parke » Sat Aug 23, 2014 11:11 am

Susan222:When my boy discovered this on July 3, 2011, he<br />
named his lawyer and attempted to motivate him to document an opposition and his<br />
Lawyer advised him he was not processing something since he, my boy, did not operate the<br />
Display and he'd, the lawyer, submitted what he really wants to. Therefore my boy submitted the<br />
Doubt herself and delivered copies of the doubt to all of the events concerned,<br />
Simply to get a solution in the Attorney-General stating he recognizes no value within the<br />
Opposition. <br />
Sadly, processing the doubt by himself was probably an extremely bad idea. Your boy doesn't understand what the law states and courtroom process as an attorney does. This is exactly why your boy requires a lawyer within the first place. Customers frequently believe that their attorneys must do items that, towards the customer, appears like it'd assist their situation. However it isn't uncommon the client misunderstands regulations which exactly what the client wishes the lawyer to complete either is not feasible underneath the guidelines or is not likely to assist the customer. While his lawyer informed your boy he was not likely to document the doubt, your boy must have regarded the genuine chance that his attorney understands anything he does not which processing the objection would not aid (and may harm) his situation. By processing the doubt herself, he (1) virtually assured that his lawyer might proceed to withdraw (as occurred below) and (2) place himself ready where it'll be very difficult to locate another attorney to get the charm. It is difficult enough to locate a lawyer to get a at this time of the overall game actually with no customer who files material by himself. Lawyers do not like addressing criminal customers who document material by themselves?it may screw-up the situation, and places the attorney in a poor placement since it suggests the customer lacks rely upon the attorney and wont work using the lawyer. Several lawyers may wish to part of understanding the customer may again make a move like this. Your boy must understand why if he really wants to possess a lawyer addressing him through this.<br />
Susan222:If somebody might please assist him possibly understand this<br />
straightened out, please email...<br />
This community is intended to assist give common appropriate info and feedback on legalities. It's not really a spot to look for a lawyer. Underneath the guidelines of professional conduct in several claims and also the guidelines of the website, lawyers can't get customers from below. You can test the "Look for A Lawyer" function in the right or contact their state or nearby club organization for recommendations to lawyers who exercise legal article-conviction relief cases.
Parke
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:12 am
Top


Return to Criminal Law