Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby jordi » Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:53 pm

South Dakota should make it so that you have to get a gun, I agree.

They are just practicing their constitutional right to be part of the necessary, well armed and well regulated militia - just in case the British get all uppity again and sail over here to try to replace our football, Angus steak burgers and hot dogs, and beer with polo, fish and chips, and tea.

Our visionary founding fathers knew this was a possibility. I'm just wondering why are the other states not similarly armed? They must be Loyalists, sympathetic to the crown. Or, are they simply unwilling to defend our great nation. Either way it looks like we need to cut those two or trade them and replace them with "team players" who understand that freedom isn't free.

Vote responsibly in 2012.

Raise children who are prepared to legally arm themselves as necessary to protect our life, liberty, and pursuit of property.

America shall not fear the red menace!

We are fighting an enemy that hates our way of life, that hates our freedom, an enemy that wants to bring Sharia Law to the United States. We need to fight them over there before they come over here. We already had one 9/11, we don't need another one!

Support our troops. Support America's mission. Because is sure as hell wouldn't do you to well to stand in front of them!

We should have the freedom to decide whether we keep our current healthcare plans or not. Unlike the citizens in North Korea, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, Red China, Libya, etc. who get imprisoned or killed for disagreeing with big government.

If we allow the healthcare bill to fine us for choosing not to have healthcare, what will be next?

Russia was the breadbasket of Europe before the reds took it over, stole people's land and invaded the individual property rights of the individual.

Chavez is a red and a murderer who has imprisoned thousands of civilians for disagreeing with state-run big government media.

He should give his people the freedom to succeed or fail based on their own merits through the infallible free market.

Venezuela is what happens when you set the precedent that the government should determine a man's working place, working conditions, start socialist reading encounter groups, and allow government to seize private assets.

Obama's healthcare plan and legislation aims to do all of the above.
jordi
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:49 am
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby culley96 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:59 pm

BISMILLAH - in the name of ALLAH (GOD)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

[] []

Known fact:
racist tea bagger rants:

laav yaar enemy
laav thy neighbor
thou shall not kill

[][]

Hidden fact:
racist tea bagger reality:

crusades
natives(red indians)
african slaves
kkk
nra
burning witches
burning blacks
ww1
ww2
hiroshima
nagasaki
korea
congo
veitnam
iraq
afghanistan
and on and on...

and as for the 'thou shall not kill' can be conveniently changed to 'thou shall not kill 'ur own brethern in faith'' (not making it up, this is what happened in the crusades when the so-called knights killed and cooked and ate the meat of the dead)

it's up to you to decide, you want to take the tea bagger as a friend, who is a hypocrite but poses to be ur friend, is known for changing the word of THE CREATOR at the 1st opportunity and is ready to stab you from behind, or you want to take someone as an enemy, whom this hypocrite forces you to think as an enemy, but your knowing and researching about this enemy will reveal that he is calling you to establish peace and harmony. (don't believe me! watch videos of:

'yvonne ridley' (she was taken a captive by talibaan)

and 'terry holdbrooks,' (worked for the us army, served in gitmo bay))

and Here is a fair question:

would racist tea baggers instead of spending billions in hate and war, just hand out an english translation of the Quran to the public in west and let people read 'ponder' and decide themselves? i mean, this according to them, should easily earn the public sympathy and turn the public opinion in tea baggers favor.

however, the answer is 'no,' 'not a chance' and 'never'

racist tea baggers and their backers will continue to post out of context verses, but will never hand out a english translation of the Quran. Does a thief, robber, hypocrite or deceiver will ever hand out a manual that will let people recognize that he is a thief, robber, hypocrite and deceiver, no. Remember reading everything in context in Quran will expose how the tea baggers and their backers are trying to deceive you. Read and ponder upon it to see who is calling u to light and who is to darkness.

[][]

For sharia law:

[][]



sharia law is only hated by exploiters of the weak, or by those who have taken these exploiters as their 'gods' (so they submit to their desires).

sharia law unlike any other law, is for the benefit of people.

if there is sharia law, then inshALLAH(CREATOR willing):

1. AIDS will vanish from the society.

2. People dieing from drunk driving will cease to exist.

3. Enron, worldcom and madoff will not be able to steal and run and the weak of the society suffer.

4. People will not have to pay interest on their loan, and people with serious needs, unable to pay the installment on their basic necessities like a house, will not be deprived of those(meaning won't be thrown out of the house), instead will be given time when their situation improves and can pay it back.

5. Women will enjoy remarkable standards of freedom not offered by anyone(for the skeptics, read wth open eyes, think why divorce rate among muslims is the lowest, and no it's not just other parts of the world, even in the western society, the lowest divorce rate is among muslims, why if their rights really get violated?), no man can leave his women as single mom and she has to suffer all day work and then go home raise kids, and these same kids leave her when she becomes older, but the man has to earn and provide support for the women and the children, and if she chooses to work, she, according to the law, can keep the money to herself, meaning the requirement for earning and supporting will still lay on the man.

6. inflation will be a thing of past, instead prices will continue to fall until things become affordable for every person in the society.

7. people will not be treated as slaves by the rulers, instead rulers will have to act as servants of the people, where people can hold them accountable anywhere and anytime, for as little as loosing a needle, that belonged to he public.

'Read the islamic history before making any judgment on what sharia law is' and to abandon these shackles that these top elites and exploiters want you wear, just to have their interests served, don't submit to them as if they are 'gods' submit to THE ONLY TRUE GOD(ALLAH), WHO IS calling towards benefits, not suffering, for you.
culley96
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:42 am
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby porter » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:06 pm

private community militias? sounds like a bunch of stupid pissed off red necks with guns and an angry mob mentality, aimlessly causing destruction and violence
porter
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:23 pm
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby norwyn » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:12 pm

Thought I do not agree on all you wrote, I tell you this, you have chutspa!!
norwyn
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:27 am
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby hob97 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:20 pm

Just try not to hurt yourself (or anyone else) as you're playing soldier.
hob97
 
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:59 pm
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby alleyne » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:25 pm

Just try not to hurt yourself (or anyone else) as you're playing soldier.
Stay on your medication!
alleyne
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:05 am
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby ruelle » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:30 pm

Ever tried AA?
ruelle
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:07 pm
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby gwynethpaltrow8 » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:39 pm

i don,t think he herad of the kkk
gwynethpaltrow8
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:57 pm
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby blaisdell » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:40 pm

I agree..We should only fund a Navy to protect trade. State Militias are perfect for defense. What that means is we would no longer be able to be the Worlds Police and The Dems and Rinos would NEVER give that up no matter how they have to trample your freedom and Liberty.
blaisdell
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:28 pm
Top

Civil war was 150 years ago! Why is anyone still against private community militias to protect state rights?

Postby tiernan » Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:43 pm

I do believe this administration is attempting to take more and more rights away from Americans. Hopefully we can change this practice through the election cycle. If not, it may come down to people to fight for their freedoms That will have to be our last result, but it is a possibility
tiernan
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:12 pm
Top


Return to Property Law

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests