Does nature prove to us that Austrian Economics works while Keynesian Economics fails?

[dallen47]

If you are an environmentalist than you should know exactly what I am talking about.

Lets say that there is a river in the Amazon with thousands if not millions of Piranhas (Small Businesses). A group of Bulls and Cows (Big Businesses) live on the right side of the river. While another group of humans (Consumers) live on the left side on the river.

Ok with Austrian Economics the humans throw spears at a bull or two. The bull gets angry and runs to cross the river to gore the humans. The blood from the bull attracts the piranhas and the piranhas have a feast. Now the humans do this to fatten up the piranhas. Who they hunt later on and feast on the Piranhas. Hey its easier to spear a fat Piranha than catch a bull right. See it all works together in nature.

Now lets try this with Keynesian economics. The humans get a leader (Federal Reserve or Government) who tells them to over fish the Piranhas to the point they go extinct. So now when the humans are going hungry. The leader tells them to throw spears at the bulls on the other side. Now that there are no piranhas to feed on the angry bloody bulls when they cross the river.

What do you think will happen to the humans once those Bulls cross the river?

[koltin]

Well, then the big guys will come back over and credit(bleed) us to death again and the sharks still alive at the bottom of the river circling lazily (lawyers) will handle the ensuing bankruptsys and hand us back to the Bulls until there is a misstep and they sue the Bulls also and the Sharks will eat the Bulls and the People and then they will starve to death too. Did I get that right?

[sherborne16]

Sorry but nature doesn't prove or disprove anything that's not natural. I can't comment on if I believe you or not, but nature doesn't support unnature things.

[marmion]

That doesn't sound much like a question, it sounds more like a political rant.