Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?

by **colten** » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:45 pm

Why would they be? America is humanity's best hope.

by **lamarr3** » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:47 pm

Why would they be? America is humanity's best hope.

no

by **larry** » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:48 pm

Why would they be? America is humanity's best hope.

no

They don't charge countries, they charge people. The United States doesn't recognise the court (as far as I'm aware) so your question is moot

by **jabarl** » Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:58 pm

Why would they be? America is humanity's best hope.

no

They don't charge countries, they charge people. The United States doesn't recognise the court (as far as I'm aware) so your question is moot

Only individuals are charges, and since the US ignores the court, it would be pointless.

by **eilis** » Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:06 pm

Harry S Truman should have been. For dropping 2 atom bombs on civilian targets (Hiroshima Aug. 6, 1945 and then Nagasaki Aug. 9, 1945, killing 1/2 a million people). If that's not a war crime, what is?

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links:

Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?

Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?

Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?

Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?

Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?

Has the International Court at the Hague ever charged the United States with violations of international law ?