If Antelman Technologies Ltd. had made a cure to AIDS and had it patented, why on earth would it be withheld?

1 post • Page 1 of 1

If Antelman Technologies Ltd. had made a cure to AIDS and had it patented, why on earth would it be withheld?

by shen86 » Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:36 pm

You can patent something that does not work as described. from avert.org:
"After it *(Tetrasilver tetroxide) was promoted as an AIDS cure in Zambia the government banned Tetrasil because it has no proven benefits for people living with HIV."

The chemical will kill HIV in a test tube. It is mostly used to clean swimming pools.

shen86: Posts: 7; Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:05 am

Top

1 post • Page 1 of 1

Related topics

Replies

Views

Last post

Why is there a U.S. government patented cure for AIDS not being used?
by ricki » Thu Apr 07, 2011 12:25 am

6 Replies

341 Views

Last post by yago
Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:11 am
AIDS CONSPIRACY 101: Has tetrasilver tetroxide ever been proven to not cure AIDS?
by dubh35 » Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:30 pm

3 Replies

370 Views

Last post by darrell
Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:47 pm
Cure for aids?!?!?!?!?!?!?
by rolfe16 » Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:36 am

0 Replies

46 Views

Last post by rolfe16
Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:36 am
The goverment really does know a cure for AIDS?
by eorl » Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:23 am

3 Replies

109 Views

Last post by ear
Thu Apr 07, 2011 10:37 am
Can this be considered the cure for aids?
by weiford » Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:45 am

2 Replies

93 Views

Last post by tahmelapachme33
Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:54 am

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links:

If Antelman Technologies Ltd. had made a cure to AIDS and had it patented, why on earth would it be withheld?

If Antelman Technologies Ltd. had made a cure to AIDS and had it patented, why on earth would it be withheld?

Who is online