Okay, I live in a country setting and own a dog. Most of my neighbors have one, as well. My problem is that we have a guy who rides a horse down the road occasionally and carries a pistol with him. His says he does so in order to protect his horse. The problems is that he seems to believe that if a dog barks at his horse and spooks it, that gives him the right to fire his gun at the dog in question. I don't let my dog run free. He is either outside on a tie-out in the front or backyard, in the house, or being walked by me. But yes, if he sees a horse walking by, he's probably going to bark. That's what dogs often do...
This guy has stopped in front of my house before when my dog was barking, and I've stepped outside to see what he was doing. He then started moving again. My guess is that he was contemplating on whether to shoot at my dog or not. I've told him in very clear terms that if he fires a gun onto my property, I will not hesitate to blow him out of his shoes. I'm not a violent person, but bullets aren't intelligent. Even if he fires at my dog, he'll also be risking the bullet going into my house. Besides, I'm not going to let someone kill my dog if he's secured on my property and not a threat. What gets me about this is that the person has a large ranch on which he can ride his horse. If he's so concerned about it getting spooked while he's riding it on the road, why not just ride it on his own damn property? My question is, if he pulls a gun to shoot at my dog, do I have the legal right to fire at him first? God, I would hate for it to come to that, but I'm not going to let some idiot put my family in danger.

