Law-Forums.org

by **eddis** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:02 am

"The question is if I were elected and Congress were to pass the Dream Act, would I veto it and the answer is yes," Romney said.

"For those that come here illegally, the idea of giving them in-state tuition credits or other special benefits, I find to be contrary to the idea of a nation of laws," Romney said.

"If I'm the president of the United States I want to end illegal immigration so that we can protect legal immigration. I like legal immigration."
http://news.yahoo.com/republican-candidate-romney-veto-immigration-dream-act-023856783.html

by **tim** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:10 am

He is the only one dreaming.

by **mace** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:11 am

Romney 2012

Answer my question for a free 10 points!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AgOAGDZx6bZtv2MDrRCCrnbty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20120101151652AAtpGXC

by **chatima** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:35 am

Yes. I agree with his stance on illegal immigration, however, I would go a little further than him.

by **shipley** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:39 am

If only we could believe him. Hes Obama all over again

by **christos** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:42 am

All politicians lie.

by **croslea** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:50 am

Romney IS the only one willing to speak out about illegals. Perry gives them anything they want, Ron Paul has no immigration policy, Cain would have been my first pick. Romney is 2nd merely due to his thoughts on freak'en lowly illegals.

by **wardell** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:54 am

Romney IS the only one willing to speak out about illegals. Perry gives them anything they want, Ron Paul has no immigration policy, Cain would have been my first pick. Romney is 2nd merely due to his thoughts on freak'en lowly illegals.

I'm waiting to see what the NRA has to say about the candidates before I make my final decision.

However, that comment earned Romney 2 points in my little voting book.

by **alburt** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:02 am

Romney would do no different than Obama... They, Romney and Obama, are the slaves to the rich and powerful Capitalist/communists who control the White house and Congress by filling their need for $$$$$$$ and Power...

The dream act is dead in the water because it would make none of the Communists any Money so it would serve no purpose...

The owners of America's Politicians will dictate what will be and the scumbags in WDC will do as they are told...

It is what it is... just another shadow Promise that will never happen...

You will be hearing a lot of Promises darn few will ever be kept.... This is AMERICA of today not the America of the Ronald Reagan days....

FNS

by **atworth49** » Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:11 am

Anything the magic underwear candidate says is suspect unless endorsed by Fruit of the Loom.

Law-Forums.org

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Should we applaud Romney for telling the truth that the DREAM Act is not a bipartisan bill & he would veto it?

Who is online