Law-Forums.org

[anglesey34]

It will be based on a zero gubment involvement and true laissez faire chapitalist system.

Here are its initial conditions:

This reservation will receive no military protection. (gubment service)
This reservation will have no infrastructure. (gubment service)
This reservation will contain no political supporters. (this 'politics' is too much like gubment)
This reservation will contain no labor. (too communistic)
This reservation will contain no exchanges (similar to infrastructure and a gubment or social service)
This reservation will contain no consumers except the crapitalists themselves. (consumers arrive when something is produced)

Let's try it and see how many jobs they create now eh, bytches?



LOL @ the R-tard Teabaggers.

[anglesey34]

It would end with the few survivors begging to come back to civilization.

[mads]

are you really this stupid? laissez faire capitalism means separation of state and economy, not anarchy. most of us Still want a military and a government.

and learn how to spell government.

[bachir93]

I don't think that most "capitalists" are "true laissez faire" capitalists. That has always been extremely rare. You seem to think that capitalism is anarchy.

[tai38]

And then who would pay for your welfare check? You've got to think these things through.. else you may end up having to do something truly horrible.. like actually having to work to take care of yourself.

[forde]

They would succeed, whereas the liberal colony would implode. They'd have no one to tax, there would be no jobs.

[advent]

Apparently.....you don't know what the word "Deport" means.....

[burdett]

"utopias" don't work as the world has many shades of grey

[oded]

It is clear that you are in need of some education. I will be more than happy to educate you.

Jobs in this situation would be created *without* government assistance or interference. Person A would form a company and hire people; the employer and employee would negotiate a wage they both consider fair. Person B works for Person A, earns money, and then spends his money buying products that have been manufactured by other people who have formed businesses.

If/when Person B gets tired of working for Person A, he will go start his own business and hire people to work for him.

As for the military protection...one person forms a military service corporation. The employees are paid to fight and they spend their time being trained when they are not fighting. These employees could also double as private security forces and/or the regular police force.

Infrastructure would be covered by service providers. In this instance, monopolies make sense--it is pointless to have 10 water utility providers all using different pipes. One company laying one set of pipes will cover everyone. It might also happen that the company simply lays the pipes and then the actual service providers simply rent the use of the pipes to provide water to the customers.

Labor unions are not needed when employees and employers negotiate fair wages with each other on a one-on-one basis.

No political supporters? *whew* Thank goodness for that.

I don't think you know what an "exchange" is. Would there be stock exchanges? Yes, if corporations decide to sell stock to investors. Would there be "health insurance exchanges"? No--the consumers would buy insurance from whatever company they want and may change companies at any time.

No consumers? Are you serious? What do you think the people who are employed will do with the money they make? They will go out and buy the goods or services they don't already have and cannot make for themselves.

The subject is called "economics". Perhaps you should go to your local library and check out a few books about it.