Elegance

[Gottfried]

I've worked as of this business since 1996, the businesses Plans and Procedures suggest that if a worker includes a Substance Problem. They ought to come forward and the organization will look after all of the charges for therapy and there will be no retribution. I got forward acknowledging an issue using a prescription med that were recommended in my experience. Since therapy I've been provided eccessive repremands and its been like walking on eggshells for yesteryear year. They claimed no retribution but my evaluation has been withheld, I've been confronted to be ended numerous occasions, and I also have many talks recorded between time, Administrators, and myself and they accepted that I was treated differently due to the drug issue. I've filed a demand using the E.E.O.C. That will be presently at Lawsuit. Our issue arrives I have to get a lawyer to speed things up. Since The E.E.O.C. is natural and I'm disappointed with the outcomes. What must I do? I've enough proof that I'm they'd settle out-of court to retain something from going public. Cheers for just about any guidance or support!

[Ackley]

Thanks for the advice. This E.E.O.C. things is a back and forth very stressful thing.

[Turner]

Within The court of legislation my drug issue is treated like a medical situation, additional workers with medical problems haven't been treated the way in which I've been. It's an extended history, I still have my work, but that's not the purpose. They lied and it's recorded and on recording. I simply require a lawyer to hear and evaluate the information.

[Ludovic]

They don;t know if it has merit until they investigate. That only means you raised some potentially valid reasons, not that they believe you.

[Shawe]

The EEOC did an onsight investigation at the company I work for.
I don't think they would drive 2 hours if the claim didn't have merit.

[bow]

My claim must have some kind of merit or the EEOC would not have done an onsight on the company, which was really like mediation that my employer originally declined.

[Frisco]

Of course the EEOC is neutral - that's the whole point. Their purpose is to see if your claims have merit, not push your agenda.If you want to consult an attorney, go ahead.

[Geovanni]

That doesn't follow either. How do they know that your claim has merit without doing any kind of investigation?