I have received a letter from a well-known media company, demanding £1000 in damages for displaying one of their images on my website.
But here's the thing - I haven't.
I merely took a snapshot of a website that just so happens to have used one of their images as part of the design for that website, and the tracking software they have used believes that I have taken that snapshot purely to rip-off the image on that website, yet I only took a snapshot of the website as an example of good web design, nothing more.
Am I really liable for copyright infringement?
A good analogy would be an author paying a license to use a piece of artwork for his book cover, and then once all the books hit the stores, the artist seeks damages from all the bookshops for displaying instances of his artwork all over their store, because it features on all the books!
I looked through the 1988 patents act, and I am hoping that I am covered by something called 'Incidental inclusion of copyrighted material' - section 31.
Any help of guidance on this matter would be very helpful. Many thanks!

