My wife has suffered from chronic headaches for more than a year now. Her medical doctors(PCP and specialist) have confirmed that these severe headaches are as a result of her sinuses getting aggravated because too much material was pushed into them during the root canal procedure done at her dentist's office. Her medical doctors have also confirmed using CAT scan that there is still lot of material in her sinuses. Unfortunately, they are not even sure when she will be able to recover from this sinus problem. In their expert opinion it can take from few months to a couple of years before the extra material drains off naturally!
My wife wanted to sue her dentist but was unable to find a dental malpractice lawyer. Her new dentist suggested that she request California Dental Association(CDA) for a peer review of her root canal procedure. He is of the opinion that once the peer review is complete and the old dentist is found at fault, dental malpractice lawyers would be willing to take my wife's case.
However, while filling the peer review application we noticed California Evidence code section 1157, that says "neither the records not any proceedings relating to this matter of the dental society's Peer Review Committee, or of the CDA's council on Peer Review can be provided or used to reveal information in any manner.?es this mean that the dental malpractice lawyer will be unable to use the outcome of CDA's peer review?
Will the outcome of the peer review help us find a dental malpractice lawyer? If not, is it worthwhile going through the peer review process?
Any other suggestion?

