For instance, if a person has two different personalities. One of the personalities is very careless with his money, while the other wants to save. The one that is careless agrees that he wants to save, but needs help. So he goes to the bank and opens up a bank account, but only one of the distinct personalities is allowed to withdraw from it and use the money for a good reason, such as paying a bill or buying groceries, rather than a bad reason like eating out and entertainment. You can tell which personality is in control, and it is explained to the bank.
So since he's in agreement with his other self, then should this be okay?
Considering the guy's got mental problems, he should have some rights. He is a disabled American citizen, and he is deemed not a threat.
He does not want a payee because he has to pay for it. I don't see what's wrong with this at all. If necessary, he can make a contract with the bank freeing them from liability for giving the money to the other personality, even though that's not going to happen because the two personalities are in cooperation when it comes to this matter.
This is a serious question, and a hypothetical situation. I wonder what the law would say about this. I assume not everyone who has a multiple personality disorder has to be institutionalized their entire life, but I'm not a psychologist. Thank you for your input.

