by hanan » Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:30 am
Whenever this question comes up people seem to talk either about 'points' immigrants or 'family class' immigrants but do so as if there was only one group.
I'm strongly in favour of points immigration where people are assessed on their points for language, education, job skills etc. What I strongly oppose is the 'chain immigration' that family class immigration leads to. Basically once a points immigrant gets into Canada they turn around and invite their immediate family who invite their immediate family etc.
So while it is true Canada takes in hundreds of thousands of immigrants, we do not take in hundreds of thousands of qualified immigrants who will convert to law abiding, income earning tax payers.
Moreover, the family class has so distorted our immigration quotas that the government's hands are tied and they are forced to issue family class visas with few restrictions. This has resulted in s small group of countries dominating, and squeezing out, immigrants from other countries.These immigrants come from countries where the extended family model means they all have tons of relatives to invite to Canada. As they are not points immigrants they do not have to know English or French or have any job skills. They do not pay taxes but they consume social services. In effect, they are the 'mooch class'.
Countries such as Russia and the Ukraine, to name two, do not send many immigrants to Canada. The few who make it here come from nuclear families so they cannot use chain immigration to lever points immigrants. They are almost purely points immigrants, This is a double standard which makes it nearly impossible for people to come to Canada from Eastern Europe.
The Harper Conservatives like the current system just fine since it was immigrants more than anyone else who gave them their coveted majority government. They will repay these communities by further increasing the supply of reliable immigrant voters from these preferred countries.