by dannie7 » Tue Feb 18, 2014 4:34 pm
I'm-not in UT, but I've NEVER heard about any scenario in which a contract needs to be notarized (in any state).As for whenever a contract needs to stay writing (which is what I suppose you mean by "closed"), see California Civil Code Section 1624 as of this url: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=civ&group=01001-02000&file=1619-1633.This is California's version of the "statute of frauds," and is, in my opinion, fairly representative of each state's version of that common-law principle (though, obviously, numerous claims may require a written contract in most cases that CA does and may require on in certain cases where CA does not)."I have a real estate contract from the contractor and wish to know if it's a legitimate contract or if we must have it notarized etc."The word "real estate contract" might mean lots of various things (I am also unsure what you mean when you state that you "have" this type of contract). It may be an arrangement for the move of a pursuit in real house, which comes within the range of the statute of frauds in most condition. Or it may be another thing that does not drop within the range of the SOF.