Login with your favorite social network:

[Audwine]

We've authorized a Rental Agreement. Since that time Landlord(true estate company) began generating problems. I truly hope not, but we possibly may need undoubtedly to record in the Court of Law. I've found that the content material that we've is not authorized by the Landlord.We presented them a Deposit.In and paid book for a lot of weeks the Courtroom may well this Agreement be genuine, to implement all conditions that are pointed out, nonetheless? Because the Landlord mightn't supply us a closed copy.Thank you tremendously!

[Gowan]

[Fahy]

Locke?s definition of political power has an immediate moral dimension. It is a ?right? of making laws and enforcing them for ?the public good.? Power for Locke never simply means ?capacity? but always ?morally sanctioned capacity.? Morality pervades the whole arrangement of society, and it is this fact, tautologically, that makes society legitimate.Locke?s account of political society is based on a hypothetical consideration of the human condition before the beginning of communal life. In this ?state of nature,? humans are entirely free. But this freedom is not a state of complete license, because it is set within the bounds of the law of nature. It is a state of equality, which is itself a central element of Locke?s account. In marked contrast to Filmer?s world, there is no natural hierarchy among humans. Each person is naturally free and equal under the law of nature, subject only to the will of ?the infinitely wise Maker.? Each person, moreover, is required to enforce as well as to obey this law. It is this duty that gives to humans the right to punish offenders. But in such a state of nature, it is obvious that placing the right to punish in each person?s hands may lead to injustice and violence. This can be remedied if humans enter into a contract with each other to recognize by common consent a civil government with the power to enforce the law of nature among the citizens of that state. Although any contract is legitimate as long as it does not infringe upon the law of nature, it often happens that a contract can be enforced only if there is some higher human authority to require compliance with it. It is a primary function of society to set up the framework in which legitimate contracts, freely entered into, may be enforced, a state of affairs much more difficult to guarantee in the state of nature and outside civil society.

[Suffield]

terms that are stated I interpreted it as more of an argument for egalitarian distribution of goods and property. People should have roughly the same amount as each other because no one has any greater claim to it than anyone else. In practice the best way to enforce this(Or not enforce at all) is to exercise rights based on possession because people can only roughly possess the same amount as one another Sources: http://flag.blackened.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&p=3354581 newuser55866738 53 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

[maddockson74]

I interpreted it as more of an argument for egalitarian distribution of goods and property. People should have roughly the same amount as each other because no one has any greater claim to it than anyone else. In practice the best way to enforce this(Or not enforce at all) is to exercise rights based on possession because people can only roughly possess the same amount as one another

[alahmoot68]

Person I know works in a 50-story bldg in Denver. Ownership holds yearly contest w/various prizes to thank tenants. This yr, prize advertised as cruise to Alaska, inc airfare and hotel, w/value $6,000. My friend won the drawing.Since then, all downhill. The hired travel agent told my friend that since less than $4K was collected in sold tickets, if wanted to do cruise, no airfare or hotel because not enough $$.Mtg w/mgmt team that held contest provided position that "a value of $6,000" does not really mean anything. Said if buy shirt on sale for $10 that normally $50, is $50 value but you don't get $50 if return??? Atty has said take to Small Claims Court and sue for $6K cash and will absolutely win. Friend doesn't really want to sue, but at a loss what to do next.Friend feels cheated and terribly disappointed, as he had already given prize to his parents as a 50th Anniversary once-in-a-lifetime gift. Now might have to renege, as can't afford on own.Any thoughts?