by clem84 » Thu Nov 24, 2011 7:37 am
'Skyrocket' is a kind of buzzword that overstates the case. Not only that, according to the theory of insurance, the more people in a plan the lower the cost per person. That's why we have 'group plans'...to spread the risk over a larger group of individuals. Secondly, there's a huge difference between a for profit HEALTH INSURANCE company, and a non-profit public HEALTH INSURANCE company when it comes to cost. A for profit company has a much higher operating overhead, and it has to make increased profits every quarter to maintain and enhance the price of it's shares. Medicare operates on a three percent operating overhead with no 'profit' premium. Other reforms outside the insurance venue that impinge on overall costs are way overdue for change, but let's fight one battle at a time. We need a strong public option though some form of UNIVERSAL HEALTH INSURANCE would be a better deal all around. That would in itself make health insurance affordable as befits a first world country like the United States.