Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Does Newty Tooty need a little help understanding his so called criminal law vs. acts of treason?

Criminal Law Discussion Forum

Does Newty Tooty need a little help understanding his so called criminal law vs. acts of treason?

Postby vipponah » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:03 am

The Constitution says ( concerning treason):

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.


Loss of national citizenship is possible only under the following circumstances:

Fraud in the naturalization process. Technically, this is not loss of citizenship but rather a voiding of the purported naturalization and a declaration that the immigrant never was a United States citizen.
Voluntary relinquishment of citizenship. This may be accomplished either through renunciation procedures specially established by the State Department or through other actions that demonstrate desire to give up national citizenship

Section 3 in the 14th amendment prohibits the election or appointment to any federal or state office of any person who had held any of certain offices and then engaged in insurrection, rebellion or treason. However, a two-thirds vote by each House of the Congress can override this limitation. In 1898, the Congress enacted a general removal of Section 3's limitation.

In 1975, Robert E. Lee's citizenship was restored by a joint congressional resolution, retroactive to June 13, 1865. In 1978, pursuant to Section 3, the Congress posthumously removed the service ban from Jefferson Davis.

In short, even people who commit treason still have the basic rights of a citizen in this country and can only be found guilty of treason in a court of law
vipponah
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:26 am
Top

Does Newty Tooty need a little help understanding his so called criminal law vs. acts of treason?

Postby larenzo » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:09 am

Newt is a traitor himself along with Obama and Romney
larenzo
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:45 am
Top

Does Newty Tooty need a little help understanding his so called criminal law vs. acts of treason?

Postby dodya » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:14 am

Will you liberal man children start using real names or stop posting. I no longer teach 3rd grade and find it really annoying.


Or are you in the 3rd grade? Hmmmmmmmmm
dodya
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:20 am
Top

Does Newty Tooty need a little help understanding his so called criminal law vs. acts of treason?

Postby culley96 » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:20 am

Wow nice taunting and namecalling.

The liberal trademark.
culley96
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:42 am
Top

Does Newty Tooty need a little help understanding his so called criminal law vs. acts of treason?

Postby hwistlere31 » Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:24 am

Another clueless liberal rant bites the dust.
hwistlere31
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:45 am
Top


Return to Criminal Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post