How did the Court Come To It's Decision?

by **adelphos** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:42 pm

ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9 states: The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, UNLESS when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
ARTICLE 3 SECTION 2 states: Section. 2.
Clause 1: The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State; (See Note 10)--between Citizens of different States, --between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects ( NOTHING ABOUT FOREIGN ENEMY COMBANTS )

by **jordi** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:48 pm

The Constitution is a contract between us the citizens (people) and our gov't. These people are enemy combatants and as such are not citizens. If any of these "combatants" are indeed citizens, then they are commiting treason against the United States, it's that simple. Our gov't reps however, seem to have forgotten about that time they raised their right hands and said some words that meant something but oh well, it probably wasn't that important anyway and besides now I've got my power and nobody can change that because me and my associates have made up illegal "laws" which prevent anyone from questioning our decisions and if they do we'll just have them arrested because they are obviously anti-american. Man this country is great isn't it!!!!! Thats to all you who allow it to happen, grow some @#$% and take back your rights, They Are Yours - Not The Gov'ts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by **barclay76** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:58 pm

Sickening isn't it!!!!!! The Judge was using his "own thoughts on this". That in my opinion is NOT his job.

by **zadok** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:05 pm

They made up these rights for foreign combatants against all president. It's blatant activism and it needs to be stopped and reversed.

by **max** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:12 pm

It looks like it just gives Foreigners more rights to get away with more stuff! Maybe, the Judge had or has a Foreign girlfriend!

by **erwin** » Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:18 pm

We have become so ignorant, depending on those who 'know' the 'best' for us, it is disqusting. These activist judges need to be contained.

Advertisments:

Sponsor Links: