See www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/0504031.pdf for details about
international grants to and international activities of U.S. exempt
organizations, and, especially page 3-4 about grants to foreign
organizations starting on page 3 at "Deductibility - Control
Rules".
Grants to individuals are not taxable to them. The Internal Revenue Code at section 102(a) provides that generally
gifts are not income. "Gross income does not include the value of
property acquired by gift..."http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/26/A/1/B/III/102
However, section 102(c) of the Code has "Subsection(a) shall not
exclude from gross income any amount transferred by or for an
employer to, or for the benefit of, an employee...."
Note Revenue Ruling 56-304 which has:
--- Start of Excerpt ---
Organizations privately established and funded as charitable
foundations which are organized and actively operated to carry on
one or more of the purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and which otherwise meet the
requirements for exemption from Federal income tax are not
precluded from making distributions of their funds to individuals,
provided such distributions are made on a true charitable basis in
furtherance of the purposes for which they are organized.
However, organizations of this character which make such
distributions should maintain adequate records and case histories
to show the name and address of each recipient of aid; the amount
distributed to each; the purpose for which the aid was given; the
manner in which the recipient was selected and the relationship,
if any, between the recipient and(1) members, officers, or
trustees of the organization,(2) a grantor or substantial
contributor to the organization or a member of the family of
either, and(3) a corporation controlled by a grantor or
substantial contributor, in order that any or all distributions
made to individuals can be substantiated upon request by the
Internal Revenue Service.
---End of Excerpt---
The key issue is that the church should choose from a large class. As to the size of the class to be benefitted, see page 6 of the IRS
publication from 1999, "Disaster Relief And Emergency Hardship Programs"
---Start of Excerpt--
A disaster relief or emergency hardship organization will avoid the
problem of a limited class if, in addition to meeting the other
organizational and operational requirements, it defines its class
of beneficiaries in an "open-ended" manner. For example, an
organization might be formed to aid those injured or killed while
undertaking fire fighting efforts. This open-ended class would
include victims of future fires, rather than being limited to
victims of a particular fire. If the class is open-ended, the
presence of ascertainable beneficiaries does not preclude exemption
under IRC 501(c)(3). However, the class must be truly open. If an
organization operates to benefit particular individuals, the fact
that it broadly describes a theoretical class of beneficiaries will
not save it. Bogert at section 363.
---End of Excerpt--http://goo.gl/tOUkd
How did you decide upon that one person? Did you review the cases of many persons to decide who was most needy or what?
You don't need to answer me, but those are the type of questions that the IRS would have. Harvey Mechanic, Attorney at Law -
[email protected]
P.S. This response is intended to be a general statement of law, should not be relied upon as legal advice and does not create an attorney/client relationship.