by chadburne48 » Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:16 pm
If this individual's employment hasbeen terminated, and the house was supplied as component of their employment (not really a separate tenancy), no more notice to stop is vital ahead of an eviction action is began:
Estimating California Code of Civil Procedure, Sec. 1161.
A tenant of genuine house, for a term less than life, or the executor or administrator of his or her estate heretofore certified and now performing or hereafter to be qualified and act, is guilty of unlawful detainer:
1. When he or she remains in possession, in individual or by subtenant, of the home, or any portion thereof, following the expiration of the word that it's let to him or her supplied the expiration is of the nondefault character nevertheless triggered with no authorization of his or her landlord, or the successor in estate of his or her landlord, if proper such as the circumstance exactly where in actuality the person to be eliminated became the tenant of the premises as a servant, employee, agent, or licensee and the partnership of master and servant, or employer and employee, or principal and broker, or licensor and licensee, has been legally terminated or the full time set for occupancy by the contract among your parties has ended but absolutely nothing in this subdivision shall be interpreted as avoiding the removal of the tenant in just about any other legal way but in case there is a tenancy at-will, it should initial be terminated by notice, as prescribed in the Civil Code.
* * *
As it seems like lots of procedures may have been ignored in the development and administration of the employer-employee partnership, nevertheless, it'd seem sensible to have the problems and specifics examined with a lawyer.