Law-Forums.org

[lundie]

Are you REALLY retarded-enough to think they should STILL be creating jobs after it's ANNOUNCED record tax-INCREASES are less than two years away?
Let's compare your claims to the facts:
Clinton = 2,337,875 per year (let's not pretend you're unaware this was under GOP fiscal policy)
H Bush = 591,750 per year
W Bush = 551,125 per year overall, including after Democrats got the keys - BUT, we're looking at tax-cut effects, so:
Full implementation to cancellation announcement = 2,549,428 per year. Which of the above is "much higher" again?

Also, let's compare:
Beginning of W Bush term to seating of Democrat Congress = 1,375,000 jobs ADDED per year
Seating of Democrat congress to seating of GOP House = 1,674,500 jobs ELIMINATED per year
Since seating GOP House = 2,177,647 jobs ADDED per year

Obama DIDN'T run against GOP policy AT ALL. He ran against DEMOCRAT policy he had already voted for in the Senate. Obama "inherited" absolutely NOTHING Obama didn't vote FOR.

[shaddoc98]

i thought the tax cuts where there to give breaks to americans as raising taxes would mean more money out of a business's pocket which would mean they hire less people, which would mean people arent paying the higher taxes which mean obama would have to tax the 1% more, which would mean the 1% are going to put more their money overseas so they would stop losing it to taxes, which get spent in 7 1/2 days by the fed, which would mean people would blame business for sending jobs overseas, such a vicious circle. honestly nobodies plans have worked but id rather have the private sector fix our economy rather than the feds, as spending money to fix the economy makes it worse. oh those silly liberals.