In all the furor over same-sex marriage, I continually see people raising religious objections to it and against homosexuality in general.
Marriage is a civil contract. It grants rights and benefits to the two people who enter into the contract. Religion has no bearing on this. Procreation has no bearing on this, either - there is no stipulation in the contract that children will be borne. If there were, the elderly and the infertile would have to be barred, too. Religion does not enter into this at all.
Since marriage is a civil contract, the only two options available under the rule of law are:
1. Stop unconstitutionally denying the right to enter into this contract on the basis of gender.
or
2. Eliminate the contract itself, along with all the rights and benefits of it. All of them.
This is a simple black-and-white question of law and the Constitution. Either all citizens have equal rights to enter into the contract, or the contract itself is unconstitutional and needs to go.
Why do the religious seem to have such a hard time with this concept?

