by Timeus » Sun Mar 02, 2014 3:22 am
Not really Actually, the short answer is "No." There are too many ways for information to come into the country. Phones, email, fax, ham radio... and if the US tries to censor an article, a newspaper will scream bloody murder. The only way to censor the press a little is to censor it a lot. Major newspapers, like the Washington Post or the New York Times(the kind that actually discover news rather than just reprint it from the wire services) will occasionally seek guidance from the government concerning very sensitive news stories. They?ll sometimes delay(but not bury) news stories if they think that printing it will put people in danger. As for the wire services, if anything it?s just the opposite. There are several instances of photographers doctoring or staging photos to create an anti-US(or anti-Israel, a US ally) view of an event. The government does not suppress these photos. If they?re withdrawn, it?s because somebody(often a web site) notices the fakery. If you can cite some of the articles you?ve seen withdrawn, we can investigate them. It?s essentially impossible for the government to suppress information once it?s out there; just watch the way the record and movie companies have tried and failed to suppress illegal copying. Those articles may have contained falsehoods and were later retracted, or perhaps there are other reasons. "Information wants to be free," as they say, and there are just too many anti-US sources of information for me to believe that the government has successfully repressed much of anything. PamPerdue 73 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.