Isn't the fact that the Department of Justice has opened criminal investigations into the Libor Scandal?

by **smid** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:49 pm

Anyone who thinks that the financial industry should not be regulated is out of their ******* minds, and has chosen to completely ignore the financial history of the United States.

by **erwin** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:51 pm

"Deregulation would mean that there are few rules and if there are no rules to break, then no harm and no foul."

^ in the top 5 of the stupidest things I've ever read here

by **breasal** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:56 pm

"Deregulation would mean that there are few rules and if there are no rules to break, then no harm and no foul."

^ in the top 5 of the stupidest things I've ever read here

says fix news

by **drystan** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:04 pm

Who are You ????

by **adaya** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:06 pm

Obama is busy covering up that scandal.
.
I guarantee that nothing will come out from the Justice Department over this.
.

by **teyrnon72** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:08 pm

So because a bunch of banksters conspired to fix interest rates on debt instruments around the world, this is a sign of TOO MUCH regulation?

Interesting angle. Completely out of touch, stupid, and reflective of a basic misunderstanding of the financial system--but nonetheless interesting.

by **wal49** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:19 pm

Are you stoned, stupid, or a republican? After the scams of Lincoln Savings and Loan, Enron, Silverado Savings, and Wall Streets mortgage shenanigans your calling for less regulations? How republican!

by **atworth49** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:23 pm

When Obama had to choose between ex-Goldman-Sachs Fat Cats Jon Corzine and Tim Geitner, he chose the more dishonest one. And thats saying something!

by **kendell** » Sat Jul 21, 2012 3:25 pm

ACORN? Bernanke?Geithner?Obama????
Read!
http://larouchepac.com/

Advertisments:

Useful Links: