by boase65 » Tue Feb 18, 2014 12:43 pm
"If that's the situation, then what's the purpose of Joint Custody if I can't get our daughter when she's not and hasn't experienced the care/custody of my ex?" I believe perhaps you are complicated joint legal custody with physical custody. Shared legal custody means that both parents must certanly be included with any legal decisions concerning the child (decisions on schooling, faith, health-related decisions, etc.). It's no bearing on the physical custody. As others have suggested, if your wish will be in a position to have the chance to actually parent the child during situations Once the other guardian is unavailable to take action, outside the visitation plan, this really is often resolved by ... the Right of First-Refusal per courtroom order. ROFR indicates that if the parent who's scheduled to have the child is accessible for a particular period of time (which differs per purchase...but usually is just a long term period such as 4 hours, 8 hours, immediately, etc.), then the non-scheduled parent must certanly be provided the chance to parent that child first. When the non-scheduled parent is not capable (or decides to not), only then may the scheduled parent location the child within the treatment of an alternate caregiver (such as grandparents, babysitters, daycare, etc.). Your showing that you only have ROFR for birthdays appears a Touch odd. Have you been certain this is the way the decree/parenting strategy says?