Legitimate To Utilize A Phrase In Alternative Of Another In Agreement?

[gillian59]

Might a company be held responsible if within an occupation contract a particular phrase can be used for another and then this causes a problem that results in court? The word "discretionary bonus" was utilized in the work contract because itis thought that the "discretionary bonus" is permitted legally to possess breaks and disciplinary penalties withheld from. But because this "discretionary bonus" is computed on a particular proportion of sales, on a predetermined timetable, and fairly clearly anticipated by all sales people who it may be regarded by regulation "profits" although the authorized contract claims "discretionary bonus". Within the state-of Hawaii, profits are thought section of a worker's wages therefore by definition it's not allowable to be illegally fined or have deductions withheld from stated wages. Might this signed contract be voided if particular conditions didn't satisfy appropriate meanings of the term? Is this considered deliberate when observed in courtroom? If this really is a problem that ends up being suggested in court, may the authorized employment contract keep up in support of the company?<br />
Based on the appropriate description of "discretionary reward" or "discretionary spend", it's not a thing that's to be anticipated and provided in the single "attention" of the employer.<br />
 

[courtland]

Report the matter to your state department of labor if you feel you were not paid according to law.