Under Jewish Law, in order to convict someone of a Capital Offense(hypothetically), these are the steps that have to be taken:
(i)There has to be 2 Jewish Male witnesses who have memorized the Torah and the Jewish Oral tradition, and
(ii)They have to have eye contact both with each other, and the sinner
(iii)They have to warn the sinner on multiple occasions of his sin(whether its fornication, violating the Sabbath, adultery, etc) and the sinner has to acknowledge he has been warned on those occasions
After going through those steps, if they want to convict a person, he has to be brought before what is known as the Sanhedrin. The Sanhedrin was the Jewish Law court that decided legal law cases, and appointed various judges depending on the scope of the case. In the case of criminal offenses, they appointed 23 judges. In order for there to be a Sanhedrin, there has to be a Jewish Priesthood overseeing it. In order for that to be in place, there has to be a Jewish Temple.
When the Sanhedrin its judging the case, it cannot take in hearsay accounts as evidence to convict a person. It has to be direct, from multiple witnesses. And if the Sanhedrin is about to make a ruling, its parameters are narrow. If the Sanhedrin rules 18/5, the ruling is thrown out because it has the possibility of bias. If it is a 11/12 ruling, the case is also thrown out, because it is too controversial a case.
The steps here are so stringent that in practice, the death penalty was almost never enforced in Jewish history. One Rabbi in the Babylonian Talmud states that "If a court were to put someone to death once every 70 years, it was destructive".
So what do you think about the Jewish view on Capital Punishment, and how does it compare to Sharia law?

