by darce » Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:20 pm
More people are killed by road rage and premeditated vehicular manslaughter than by firearms, so why Are you not crying about that? why is it when one or two people inappropriately use a firearm that you people cry about firearms, but when a person uses their vehicle to plow through a crowd its ok. Why is it the firearms fault when it is used to kill but not the vehicles fault? Why is it not the persons fault in both cases? Quite a double standard going isn't it? Why does know one cry with joy when a firearm is used to save a life, but they are quick to blast at the right to have them when they are used illegally.
I own several firearms, Taught by the military in there use, and would never use them unless I felt threatened. Then I would shoot first and ask questions later. I learned to hesitate is to bury someone you care about. This person had an issue with something and instead of dealing with it snapped it is not the firearms fault or the places that sold it to him fault, it is his! Now they need to give the death penalty to him quickly and be done with it.
A slow publicized death would stop others from doing it. That is why hangings worked as a deterrent. Look at history.