Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Question about statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits in California?

Been the victim of Medical Malpractice or fighting a malpractice suit? Discuss it here.

Question about statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits in California?

Postby koltin » Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:25 pm

In California, I know the statute of limitations for medical malpractice is 1 year from the date of discovery of injury. I also know that the doctor must be notified 3 months in advance of the filing of the lawsuit.

What happens if the plaintiff finds a lawyer 2 months before the statute of limitations runs? How can they give 3 months notice to the doctor, and still file within 1 year?
koltin
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:14 am
Top

Question about statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits in California?

Postby hwistlere31 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:28 pm

They will likely be unable to file the claim. They should have presented notice to the doctor, even if they didn't have a lawyer yet.
hwistlere31
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:45 am
Top

Question about statute of limitations for medical malpractice lawsuits in California?

Postby cuartio52 » Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:35 pm

I can't find any mention in the statutes of notifying the doctor in advance of the lawsuit. My sources say that you have three years from the date of the injury or one year from the date of discovery, whichever comes first. notifying the doctor in advance of an impending lawsuit doesn't serve any purpose. I'd recommend you stick to worrying about filing the lawsuit in a timely manner rather than delaying it for the doctor's benefit.
cuartio52
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Top


Return to Medical Malpractice

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post