Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Regular Medical - Issue

Family Law Discussion Forum

Regular Medical - Issue

Postby hardin » Sat Jan 11, 2014 10:10 pm

I reside in Michigan and have now been divorced 3 years.  I've 2 youngsters and I am the non-custodial parent.<br />
My EX is requesting for re-imbursement for Normal Medical Fees (OME) that have exceeded the total amount that I invest in the twelve months.  I'm required to provide integrated in the JOD Healthcare Overall health Insurance coverage, though not needed to offer each and every other kind of coverage.<br />
The expense below consideration is absolutely an orthodontic expense.  My child got braces at a cost of $1,800+ bucks. Due to the fact it was a choice with my company's well being insurance coverage program   nbsp & I voluntarilydecided to provide dental insurance coverage.  My EX is requesting my component (52%) of the total quantity my dental plan didn't pay.<br />
Ought to not the quantity of my voluntary dental insurance coverage price (of over $900+) count included in my share toward the OME?  or do I devote 52percent of the non-covered expense?<br />
Thanks,<br />
DrSound<br />
 <br />
 
hardin
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:12 pm
Top

Ordinary Medical - Question

Postby Bogey » Sun Feb 02, 2014 11:03 pm

Yes, but the insurance was to insure me against the charges, not my EX.  It is the difference in me paying $270+ dollars or nothing.

 

DrSound
Bogey
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:38 pm
Top

Ordinary Medical - Question

Postby lalla3 » Thu Feb 06, 2014 2:01 pm

Well, what exactly does your divorce decree say about health insurance and medical expenses?

Quote it word for word.

 
lalla3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:18 pm
Top

Ordinary Medical - Question

Postby kenway7 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:30 am

View it this way.<br />
If you did not have the dental insurance you'd be spending 52% of two or three times just as much. Appears like a scrub to me.<br />
You have the choice of saying no and see if your judge may accept you.<br />
Or you can discuss something which you can equally reside with.<br />
Perhaps your ex lover must subscribe to the price of the dental insurance. In the end, your ex lover could be spending 48% of two or three times just as much without it.
kenway7
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 1:03 pm
Top


Return to Family Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
cron