by scirwode » Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:14 pm
I believe in deregulated monitored markets that have control mechanisms that keep competition alive, keeps the few from owning the game, and promotes the best price through incentives for innovation and creativity.
Do I believe in deregulated markets for the sake of having them, with no laws, and no third party oversight? Hell no. That doesn't work because the winners in this system seem to take advantage.
In America, we had great regulations in banking and borrowing to buy investments. Then we did away with them, largely through lobbying. So the game use to be a lot more fair. Then the winners figured out how to change the rules in their favor.
I think a good example of a deregulated market is the Texas Electric market. It has had it's up's and downs. Seemed like it was going to fail, but for the first time in the electric arena, competition seems to be starting to work, but it was a long hard process and there were bad times.