by bothan » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:45 am
The statute of limitations is a defense he will raise if you sue him. In order to get around it, you need to see if you can shelter under the doctrine of equitable tolling-- did he do anything to prevent you from discovering his mistake? The fact that you did not understand the law until more than 5 years after the suit will not help you. He has to have done something, or some condition must obtain (you were in a coma for the 5 years) that makes his statute of limitations defense unfair under the circumstances. You are appealing to the judge's sense of fairness, but not to her personal code of ethics-- meaning, you have to learn about other cases where the equitable tolling doctrine was successfully applied in malpractice cases, and try to make your case look very similar to those previously successful cases. It's going to be hard-- go to a law library and ask a reference librarian to help you look up equitable tolling in the attorney-client malpractice context.
Bear in mind, even if you get around the SOL defense, you still have to make out your claim for malpractice, to which he will raise other defenses.