by Tupper » Sun Feb 09, 2014 10:01 pm
The idea started in and was coined in California. Lawyers wanted more business and decided that the way to get that was to go for quantity, not quality. The "No Fault" part was to say, "You're not wrong, I'm not wrong, we're merely ending this marriage we contracted to keep." The problem there is in the first two clauses: one or both are incorrect. It then merely splits the total assets in half, which is not always fair, either. In my parent's case, my mom was able to demonstrate that she'd paid much of the house payment with her inheritance, so she got to keep it. That's just as well, too, since she was blind and therefore unable to work at her trained job of nurse. She'd have been virtually homeless if the house had been sold. My dad was bitter, but it was HIS fault to divorce, not hers. Yes, my mom was psychotic; so what, he married her. Anyway, every state enacts its own laws on things not mentioned in the Constitution, from driver's license to divorce, tho many imitate California. Check your own state, or better, discuss it with an actual attorney who would know. danielpauldavis 43 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.