Sign up to join one of the largest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!
Tweet Follow @LawBlogger1   

Advertisments:


Useful Links:

Bar Exam Flashcards
Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

  
Tweet

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby porter » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:36 am

FACTBOX - Tax details of US stimulus plan

Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:20pm GMT

Feb 17 (Reuters) - The $787 billion U.S. economic stimulus package contains about $287 billion in tax cuts, according to the latest congressional calculations on the value of the package and its impact on U.S. budget deficits.

President Barack Obama signed the bill on Tuesday, saying he wants quick action to boost the struggling economy.

Here are some of the major tax provisions in the bill:

FOR WORKERS, CONSUMERS AND RETIREES

* A "making work pay" refundable tax credit championed by Obama of up to $400 per individual and $800 for couples in 2009 and 2010. It is calculated at a rate of 6.2 percent of earned income and is phased out for individuals with adjusted incomes over $75,000 and couples with incomes over $150,000.

* A one-time payment of $250 to Social Security beneficiaries, railroad retirees and veterans receiving benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs. State government retirees not eligible for Social Security would also get the $250 payment.

* Increases the earned income tax credit for low-income workers with three or more children.

* Increases eligibility for the refundable child tax credit to more low-income workers. The bill reduces the income floor to $3,000 in 2009 and 2010 from the current floor of $8,500.

* A new $2,500 tax credit for college education expenses. The credit phases out for individuals earning more than $80,000 and couples with incomes over $160,000.

* An $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers for homes purchased between Jan. 1 and Dec. 1, 2009. The tax credit phases out for individuals earning more than $75,000 and couples earning more than $150,000.

* Temporary relief from the alternative minimum tax for millions of middle-class taxpayers who otherwise would be ensnared by the tax originally meant for the very wealthy.

FOR BUSINESSES

* Small businesses with gross receipts of up to $15 million can write off 2008 losses against five previous tax years. Current laws allows a two-year carryback of losses.

Businesses will also be allowed to immediately write off more of their investments in computers and other equipment.

* Businesses that repurchase debt at a lower amount than when it was issued will be able to defer taxes on it. Usually reduced or canceled debt is treated as income and taxed. The break applies to debt repurchased adjusted after Dec. 31, 2008, and before Jan. 1, 2011.

* A tax break on capital gains from the sale of stock held in a small business for more than five years.

* The bill raises about $7 billion in revenues by repealing a Treasury Department decision last year to liberalize rules that were intended to prevent companies in a merger from taking huge tax breaks on losses of firms they were acquiring.

FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

* Creates a new category of tax-preferred bonds for investment in economic recovery zones for job training, education and economic development.

* Creates a new category of tax-preferred bonds for the construction, and repair of public schools and the purchase of land for schools.

* Creates a federal subsidy for state and local governments offering bonds that give investors credits against their federal taxes in place of interest payments.

FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY

* Extends tax breaks for wind facilities and other renewable energy facilities and provides other tax incentives to encourage development of renewable energy facilities.

* Authorizes an additional $1.6 billion of new clean renewable energy bonds as well as $2.4 billion of energy conservation bonds to finance state and local government projects to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

* Extends tax credits for energy-efficient improvements to existing homes.

* Provides a tax credit for purchase of "plug-in" electric vehicles of at least $2,500. The credit is increased depending on the battery capacity of the car purchased.

* Provides a new 30 percent investment tax credit for facilities engaged in producing renewable energy technology and conservation. (Editing by Peter Cooney and David Wiessler)

http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKN1248080420090217?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0
porter
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:23 pm
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby teithi71 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:42 am

The better question is what part of the bill did they vote against?

Politicians love to slip this kind of legislation into bills that no one wants to vote against. Like slipping $5 billion for the CIA into a child protection law that no one dare vote against.
teithi71
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:49 am
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby vipponah » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:46 am

A few piddling tax cuts completely overwhelmed by tax increases and debt?
Congratulations on that one.
vipponah
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 2:26 am
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby barend31 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:49 am

too long

Americans have short memories
barend31
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:39 pm
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby dureau » Sat Dec 17, 2011 11:51 am

you mean all those tax cuts only cost a trillion dollars to vote for... what a deal
dureau
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:50 pm
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby bean » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:13 pm

who could be so foolish to think that those who contribute to the American way will not be taxed

to the hilt!!!
bean
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:26 pm
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby mohammed47 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:14 pm

The problem is there was over 9000 ear marks in the Bill too. Voting against a bill with 9000 ear marks is a good thing. Obama should have Vetod the bill because he promised he wouldnt sign a bill with a single ear mark.

Does that mean in one signature, he lied 9000 times?
mohammed47
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:02 am
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby bedyw25 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:18 pm

How do you cut taxes for people who do not pay taxes?

Now, you say they voted against tax cuts, but, what else was in the bill? I remember the Democrats going after Bush Sr. for vetoing a bill on health care or something like that, and they accused him of hating the Elderly - despite the fact he vetoed the bill because of all of the earmarks attached to it.

Could it be that the Republicans were against these because the larger bill they were in was fundamentally bad?
bedyw25
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:15 pm
Top

Which party voted AGAINST these Obama tax cuts?

Postby camdin90 » Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:25 pm

SO if a BAD bill has just 1 good part we should vote for it....typical liberal LACK OF THOUGHT...

Would vote for a bill that says EVERY ONE IN THE US will be provided health care....but anyone that is a liberal will be deported?...It has your health care in it so it must be good right.....

Did I make it simple enough for the liberal mind to understand that you must look at the WHOLE thing....not just a couple of lines out of 1000 pages...
camdin90
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:11 am
Top


Return to Class Action

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest