by lifton » Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:23 am
You are right in saying that legality does not equal morality, but you are wrong in assuming that this is relevant. Judges, when in a court room, have a legal obligation to remain impartial. If they worked based on morals, there would be no way they could remain impartial.
Judges are not legally allowed to look out for either party in a court case and are required to treat each equally as they both have the same rights. While it is true that a small number of judges may be corrupt, you cannot judge the masses by the minority.
Morality often has nothing to do with legal procedures unless it is being used to influence the decision of a jury (instead of them basing their verdict on the the evidence given, some will attempt to force them to make a decision on a moral basis, something which shouldn't happen).
Judges are trained and qualified to remain impartial. Unfortunately juries are not.
To summarise, judges are not moral people but are closer to the opposite. The are supposed to be unresponsive to the emotional side of a court case and base all decisions on the evidence presented before them. If anything, you should describe them as clinical, not moral.