Why Is There So Much Opposition To The Freedom Of Choice Act?

[delton]

If any person would like a lot more information about this proposed law, please PM me, and I will be far more than satisfied to provide it.

[marq]

MitsuSellsScentsy mentioned: 1 Unfortunately for years the debate is who has far more rights, a woman more than her physique or a fetus to life? 60 months ago

[Milburn]

I think the that this is split 50/50. For every person against it, there is someone for it.

[Aronne]

PamPerdue mentioned: four It's abortion. It is the same old arguments. It really is nearly impossible to discover a middle ground on it, simply because to 1 side it really is murder, and you truly don't compromise on murder. Handful of folks in fact hold the other extreme, but they finish up fighting it as if they were extremists simply because they are afraid of "slippery slope" arguments.Though Obama is in favor of the bill, my suspicion is that Obama will ask Congress to hold off on the bill for at least six months, so that he can get some credentials for his centrist position rather than leaping straight to a bill that divided so deeply along partisan lines. Specially since there are some anti-option Democrats, and even getting the bill through filibuster in the Senate is not a guarantee.But there will be a sturdy campaign among liberal Congressmen to get it passed speedily, to use the new Democratic majority, so it will prove an fascinating test of Obama's potential to maintain his own celebration in line. 60 months ago

[Enlai]

I suppose the expected answer is that it would codify the institution of aborting fetuses before they can be born. Which practice is, statistically, working to remove the darker-skinned population from the United States. Really. I'm surprised there isn't more noise about how this now-cultural practice is being used to eliminate African-Americans, and one of them, our President-elect, isn't even saying anything about that. It's a long-term genocide taking long enough for the ones being eliminated to not notice.  Meanwhile, to your question, most of the folks in the nation operate by rule-of-law. This means that they support the law, pretty much whatever that law is. Thus, while they don't kill abortion doctors, they do consider aborting a pregnancy to be murdering the fetus. These folks certainly don't want to see a Supreme Court decision that was as thought out as Plessy Vs. Ferguson to be codified into law.  "If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain; If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works?" (Proverbs 24:11-12) danielpauldavis 60 months ago Please sign in to give a compliment. Please verify your account to give a compliment. Please sign in to send a message. Please verify your account to send a message.

[Segar]

It's abortion. It's the same old arguments. It's nearly impossible to find a middle ground on it, because to one side it's murder, and you really don't compromise on murder. Few people actually hold the other extreme, but they end up fighting it as if they were extremists because they're afraid of "slippery slope" arguments.Although Obama is in favor of the bill, my suspicion is that Obama will ask Congress to hold off on the bill for at least six months, so that he can get some credentials for his centrist position rather than leaping directly to a bill that divided so deeply along partisan lines. Especially since there are some anti-choice Democrats, and even getting the bill through filibuster in the Senate is not a guarantee.But there will be a strong campaign among liberal Congressmen to get it passed quickly, to use the new Democratic majority, so it will prove an interesting test of Obama's ability to keep his own party in line.

[Benssen]

It may also interfere with parental rights, allowing minors to obtain abortions without their parent's knowledge.

[Nevan]

Unfortunately for years the debate is who has more rights, a woman over her body or a fetus to life?

[Luigi]

Manimal said: 3 It may also interfere with parental rights, allowing minors to obtain abortions without their parent's knowledge. 60 months ago

[Maurio]

Which practice is, statistically, working to remove the darker-skinned population from the United States. Really. I'm surprised there isn't more noise about how this now-cultural practice is being used to eliminate African-Americans, and one of them, our President-elect, isn't even saying anything about that. It's a long-term genocide taking long enough for the ones being eliminated to not notice.  Meanwhile, to your question, most of the folks in the nation operate by rule-of-law. This means that they support the law, pretty much whatever that law is. Thus, while they don't kill abortion doctors, they do consider aborting a pregnancy to be murdering the fetus. These folks certainly don't want to see a Supreme Court decision that was as thought out as Plessy Vs. Ferguson to be codified into law.  "If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain; If thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it? and shall not he render to every man according to his works?" (Proverbs 24:11-12)