by jocheved » Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:21 am
It's really up to you...
Honestly human rights lawyers and doctors are both doing rewarding things.
Training to become a lawyer is easier, though.
Law school is only three years after completing a bachelor's degree, so that's seven years of higher education. I'm sure it's stressful, but I doubt it's as stressful as medical school.
Medical school, on the other hand, often takes four years after the bachelor's degree (and often a master's degree is basically required to get into med school), and is filled with very difficult hard science, rounds at the hospital, etc. that completely wear the student out. In order to specialize in a specific thing and become a "resident," doctors must complete years more of on-site training at the hospital.
In terms of profit, doctors have to pay so much money in liability insurance that their take-home pay is not nearly as good as lawyers (of course, human rights lawyers won't make as much as corporate lawyers).
Honestly, although both professions "contribute to society" through their jobs, I'd argue that if Mr. Smith weren't a doctor, someone else would just take his place, and possibly be a better doctor than Mr. Smith, so Mr. Smith isn't really increasing the greater good anymore than if he'd become a plumber. That is, unless he's a volunteer in Doctors Without Borders or something. And I say this in spite of the fact that I'm a teacher (yes, I'm undermining my own right to say that I'm contributing to society).
It's really up to you. Personally I'd think that exploring the mysteries of the human body and biology would be far more fascinating than studying laws that a bunch of old, dead men wrote.