Not logged in? Join one of the bigest Law Forums on the Internet! Join Now!   Latest blog post: Research Law Professors Before Choosing Law Schools

Advertisments:




Sponsor Links:

Discount Legal Forms
Discounted Legal Texts


Agreement Pay

Business Law discussions

Agreement Pay

Postby Okeefe » Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:18 pm

I do not know easilyam placing this in the best region. But I have been used as a Young Child Find Coordinator/Administrative Assistant since 2000 in my own existing work. In 2000, my agreement read a complete yearly quantity; 2 yrs later, they created part of this yearly income right into a stipend to the part of the CF Planner item. I'd just get increases about the administrative asst. Item. Despite the fact that, nearly all my work was CF Planner. Associated with because my salary didn't match inside the salary plan, so in the place of making one for your Planner item, they did a stipend. The primary chef thought I created an excessive amount of cash, this really is one explanation they improved things--which she will not actually acknowledge in my experience. Our position is beyond and above what my administrative assistant position does, but she'll never recognize this.Now, I've a notice declaring from my boss for the office environment that the stipend must have never occurred. The main reason this came into being since the chef wasn't permitting me to consider compensation. Period that I was due since I went-of-city for just two times and worked beyond my regular hours. She wasn't allowing it, after allowing it for a long time, since I'm on the stipend. She's jerked me many times, as well as other people on methods--she's continuously changing to suit her needs.Now, this financial year that's arising, they'll be developing a new wage plan, and I ought to be obtaining a boost on the whole quantity, in the place of just incomplete. May I struggle on obtaining retro pay on increases for the planner part?
Okeefe
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 2:32 am
Top

Contract Pay

Postby Conleth » Sat Feb 15, 2014 9:05 pm

Retro Pay? Customer Date: 5/13/2008 8:48:14 AM Associate Just Before: 12/5/2005 I see your position---that if one plays games with your payment and the team agrees to program large raises of say 4% +/- 2% then to say that a chunk of your salary is a stipend not matter to boost is a bit of innovative double-talk which amounts to a salary freeze. Today mathamatically if your increase was within the ground regarding the total you might not have much influence. EG if you got 4% on most and 0% on relaxation and common was 3% then 3 > 2 is at the number?Filthy swimming doesn't however allow it to be illegal.Your agreement may or may not tackle a description of one's income that's useful to your view.Given the current inner politics I would recommend that your current influence to obtain current or retro pay is approximately zippo and you're most prone to find yourself on the short-list to get dismissed for many unknown rule you broke ---possibly you need significant information to keep over somebodys head or something Partners 3 steps up the meals chain who are 101% secured into your view without any retreat.Alternate problem/view--if you're simply a low-level worker according to your chef and you can DOCUEMENT same then you may be susceptible to OT pay and not be exempt.
Conleth
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:22 pm
Top

Contract Pay

Postby wetherby » Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:26 am

Thanks for answering. I did not know where you can post-it. Yes, it's a government form work. We're state-supported, and we work with colleges in addition to with companies that are with the juvenile justice organization. You will find state and federal funds involved.Should I publish this under-employment and agreements? Why might they not consider my request, after all of the notice published claims I ought to haven't been on the stipend. A stipend is cost for work completed off-hours when you yourself have a normal task. This really is my primary job.
wetherby
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:21 am
Top

Contract Pay

Postby Jesstin » Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:28 pm

SORRY, I LEFT YOU A NOTE ON THE OTHER SITE.
WASN'T SURE WHERE TO POST.
Jesstin
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 7:20 pm
Top

Contract Pay

Postby Stefan » Sun Mar 09, 2014 12:19 pm

you've already got it posted twice.As I said in answer to your other post - they have no legal obligation to give you any raise at all.
Stefan
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 10:47 pm
Top

Contract Pay

Postby Carl » Wed Mar 12, 2014 7:46 am

re: Retro Pay? ANSWER LYNN M. By: FaithinGod Customer Date: 5/12/2008 6:17:26 PM Member Since: 2/21/2007 Condition: NM Hi Lynn, I usually anticipate reading your posts. This agency that I work with may be the Central Region Educational Supportive and we're ruled with a council made from college and agency superintendents. Increases are determined as an organization to any or all workers, we're not provided raises centered on work performance. They do get audited, so if this notice that's currently likely to maintain my document, itis probable that the auditors will flag it and notice that I wasn't offered increases on my whole income for quite some time. (The part of 9,000.00 was never offered a boost that ranged from 2 percent to 6 percent annual increases.) The remainder of the income (31,000) was offered the the increase that was supplied for that year. Thanks for the input.
Carl
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 2:50 am
Top

Contract Pay

Postby Clyfland » Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:47 pm

[Reposted in the Work forum. Cheers. Denise]re: Retro Pay? By: LynnM Attorney Date: 5/12/2008 6:05:35 PM Associate Just Before: 12/5/2005 You can fight but there's never any legal obligation to give you any raise at all. So long as you make significantly more than minimum-wage, your income is as much as the employer.
Clyfland
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Jan 12, 2014 11:05 am
Top

Contract Pay

Postby Cradoe » Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:35 pm

That you don't state why this really is about the elegance board."May I struggle on obtaining retro pay on increases for that planner part?"Response To any issue of "may" is nearly always yes, but actual issue is whether or not they have to think about the demand. My stomach says "no". We-don't have much wording for the problem, but Iam betting this is just a public/government work?
Cradoe
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 2:36 pm
Top


Return to Business Law

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post